外国语 ›› 2022, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5): 43-52.

• 语言研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

中美气候变化新闻语篇中态度资源的生态话语分析

张慧, 杨连瑞   

  1. 中国海洋大学 外国语学院, 山东 青岛 266100
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-29 出版日期:2022-09-20 发布日期:2022-10-09
  • 通讯作者: 杨连瑞(1963-)(通讯作者),博士,教授,博士生导师。研究方向:应用语言学。
  • 作者简介:张慧(1989-),博士,讲师。研究方向:生态语言学。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重点项目"中国英语学习者二语语用能力发展研究"(17AYY023);山东省社会科学规划项目"生态2015.语言学视域下海洋话语体系重构与传播优化研究"(22DYYJ08)

An Ecological Discourse Analysis of Attitude Resources in Chinese and American News Discourses on Climate Change

ZHANG Hui, YANG Lianrui   

  1. School of Foreign Languages, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China
  • Received:2021-11-29 Online:2022-09-20 Published:2022-10-09

摘要: 气候变化是全人类需共同面对的严峻挑战,已引发国际社会的空前关注。新闻语篇作为大众传播的重要载体,能够传递某种态度、意向和情感,进而影响其认知及行为。本研究拟从生态话语分析范式切入,遵循气候变化论域下的生态哲学观,对中美气候变化新闻语篇中的态度资源展开深入剖析,尝试挖掘并阐发态度资源折射的生态理念与生态价值取向。研究发现:1)中美新闻语篇中态度资源三个子系统判断资源、鉴赏资源和情感资源的使用频次存在显著差异,中媒的情感资源和判断资源少于美国,而鉴赏资源的运用多于美国;2)中美新闻语篇中的态度资源均呈现出有益性生态取向、模糊性生态取向和破坏性生态取向;3)借助中美新闻语篇中态度资源的考察,分别检视出"生态优先"和"利益优先"的生态理念。

关键词: 气候变化, 新闻语篇, 生态话语分析, 态度资源, 生态价值取向

Abstract: Climate change is a serious challenge to all mankind, and has gained unprecedented attention of the international community.News discourses, as an important carrier of mass communication, can convey certain attitudes, intentions and emotions, and then affect the public cognition and behavior.Based on an ecolinguistic perspective and the ecosophy in the context of climate change, this study conducts an in-depth analysis of the attitude resources in Chinese and American news discourses on climate change in order to explore the ecological ideology and orientation.The findings are as follows:(1) There are significant differences for the frequency of affect resources, judgement resources and appreciation resources in Chinese and American news discourses.The affect and judgement resources in Chinese news discourses are less than those in America, while the use of appreciation resources is more than that in America; (2) Attitude resources in both Chinese and American news discourses reflect the beneficial, ambivalent and destructive ecological orientation; (3) By examining the attitude resources in Chinese and American news discourses, we can explore the ecological view of "ecological priority" and "benefit priority" respectively.

Key words: climate change, news discourse, ecological discourse analysis, attitude resource, ecological orientation

中图分类号: 

  • H03
[1] Alexander, R.& A.Stibbe.From the analysis of ecological discourse to the ecological analysis of discourse[J].Language Sciences, 2014, (41):104-110.
[2] Collins, L.& B.Nerlich.Examining user comments for deliberative democracy:A corpus-driven analysis of the climate change debate online[J].Environmental Communication, 2014, (9):189-207.
[3] Carvalho, A.Representing the politics of the greenhouse effect:Discursive strategies in the British media[J].Critical Discourse Studies, 2005, (2):1-29.
[4] Castillo Esparcia, A.& S.López Gómez.Public opinion about climate change in United States, partisan view and media coverage of the 2019 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP 25) in Madrid[J].Sustainability, 2021, (13):1-19.
[5] Martin, J.R.& P.R.White.Language of Evaluation:Appraisal in English[M].London:Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
[6] Norton, C.& M.Hulme.Telling one story, or many? An ecolinguistic analysis of climate change stories in UK national newspaper editorials[J].Geoforum, 2019, (104):114-136.
[7] O'Neill et al.Dominant frames in legacy and social media coverage of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report[J].Nature Climate Change, 2015, (4):380-385.
[8] Stamou, A.The representation of non-protesters in a student and teacher protest:A critical discourse analysis of news reporting in a Greek newspaper[J].Discourse and Society, 2001, (5):653-680.
[9] Stibbe, A.Ecolinguistics:Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live By[M].London:Routledge, 2015.
[10] Thompson, G.Introducing Functional Grammar[M].London:Routledge, 2014.
[11] 何伟,马子杰.生态语言学视角下的评价系统[J].外国语, 2020, (1):48-58.
[12] 黄国文.生态语言学的兴起和发展[J].中国外语, 2016, (1):9-12.
[13] 季羡林.季羡林谈东西方文化[M].杭州:浙江人民出版社, 2016.
[14] 雷毅.深层生态学:阐释和整合[M].上海:上海交通大学出版社,2012.
[15] 李淑晶,刘承宇.基于评价系统的生态话语分析——以特朗普退出《巴黎气候协定》的演讲为例[J].外语与外语教学,2020,(5):65-76.
[16] 李玉洁.生态政治哲学视阈下环境传播的话语实践创新[J].现代传播, 2019, (10):63-66.
[17] 陆佳怡,张子晗.对话与独白:联合国气候变化大会美欧中公开发言的隐喻互动[J].现代传播, 2019, (8):99-104.
[18] 王振华.评价系统及其运作——系统功能语言学的新发展[J].外国语,2001, (6):13-20.
[19] 杨阳.系统功能视角下新闻报道的生态话语分析[J].北京第二外国语学院学报, 2018, (1):33-45.
[20] 张慧,盖飞虹.生态语言学视域下中美新闻语篇中的概念隐喻[J].现代外语,2022, (5):621-633.
[21] 张慧,林正军,董晓明.中美气候变化新闻报道中生态话语的趋近化研究[J].西安外国语大学学报, 2021, (1):35-40.
[22] 郑保卫,杨柳.从中外纸媒气候传播对比看我国媒体气候传播的功能与策略——以《人民日报》《纽约时报》《卫报》为例[J].当代传播, 2019, (6):23-28.
[1] 何伟, 马子杰. 生态语言学视角下的评价系统[J]. 外国语, 2020, 43(1): 48-58.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!