外国语 ›› 2022, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5): 53-64.

• 语言研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

系统功能类型学视阈下的语法描写范式——以语气系统为例

王品   

  1. 上海交通大学, 上海 200240
  • 收稿日期:2022-04-23 出版日期:2022-09-20 发布日期:2022-10-09
  • 作者简介:王品,博士,副教授。研究方向:系统功能语言学、系统功能类型学、汉语和中国少数民族语言的系统功能语法描写。

Guiding Principles for Grammatical Description Informed by Systemic Functional Typology: A Case Study of MOOD

WANG Pin   

  1. Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
  • Received:2022-04-23 Online:2022-09-20 Published:2022-10-09

摘要: 随着系统功能类型学理论体系的初步建立,系统功能语法描写逐渐形成了一定的范式。系统功能类型学视阈下的语法描写范式主要体现在五个方面:语法描写基于语篇;采用三维视角;突出自上而下的视角;运用轴线论证的描写模式;探究语言的隐性语法。本文以人际语法中的语气系统为主要例证,对这些描写范式进行逐一说明。

关键词: 系统功能类型学, 语法描写, 基于语篇, 三维视角, 自上而下, 轴线论证, 隐性语法

Abstract: With the preliminary establishment of the theoretical framework for Systemic Functional Typology (SFT), some guiding principles have been formulated for systemic functional grammatical description.SFT-informed grammatical description features five major principles:text-based data compilation, trinocular perspectives, approaching grammar ‘from above’, axial reasoning, and cryptogrammar.This paper explains and illustrates these guiding principles, drawing chiefly on examples from the MOOD system in interpersonal grammar.

Key words: Systemic Functional Typology, grammatical description, text-basedness, trinocular perspectives, approaching grammar from above, axial reasoning, cryptogrammar

中图分类号: 

  • H04
[1] Berry, M.Systemic linguistics and discourse analysis:A multi-layered approach to exchange structure[C]//Coulthard, M.& M.Montgomery.Studies in Discourse Analysis.London:Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981a.120-145.
[2] Berry, M.Towards layers of exchange structure for directive exchanges[J].Network, 1981b, (2):23-32.
[3] Caffarel, A.Approaching the French clause as a move in dialogue:Interpersonal organisation[C]//Hasan, R.& P.Fries.On Subject and Theme:A Discourse Functional Perspective.Amsterdam/Philadelphia:John Benjamins, 1995.1-49.
[4] Caffarel, A., Martin, J.R.& C.M.I.M.Matthiessen.Language Typology:A Functional Perspective[M].Amsterdam/Philadelphia:John Benjamins, 2004.
[5] Gleason, H.A.Linguistics and English Grammar[M].New York:Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1965.
[6] Halliday, M.A.K.Language as Social Semiotic:The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning[M].London:Edward Arnold, 1978.
[7] Halliday, M.A.K.Systemic background[C]//Benson, J.D.& W.S.Greaves.Systemic Perspectives on Discourse, Vol.1:Selected Theoretical Papers from the Ninth International Systemic Workshop.Norwood, NJ:Ablex Publishing Corp, 1985.1-15.
[8] Halliday, M.A.K.Language and the order of nature[C]//Fabb, N., Attridge, D., Durant, A.& C.MacCabe.The Linguistics of Writing:Arguments Between Language and Literature.Manchester:Manchester University Press, 1987.135-154.
[9] Halliday, M.A.K.Systemic grammar and the concept of a "science of language"[J].Journal of Foreign Languages, 1992, (2):1-9.
[10] Halliday, M.A.K.On grammar and grammatics[C]//Hasan, R., Cloran, C.& D.Butt.Functional Descriptions:Theory in Practice.Amsterdam/Philadelphia:John Benjamins, 1996.1-38.
[11] Halliday, M.A.K.Working with meaning:Towards an appliable linguistics[C]//Webster, J.Meaning in Text:Implementing Intelligent Applications of Language Studies.London/New York:Continuum, 2008.7-23.
[12] Halliday, M.A.K.& C.M.I.M.Matthiessen.Construing Experience Through Meaning:A Language-based Approach to Cognition[M].London/New York:Continuum, 1999.
[13] Mahboob, A.& N.Knight.Appliable linguistics:An introduction[C]//Mahboob, A.& N.Knight.Appliable Linguistics.London/New York:Continuum, 2010.1-12.
[14] Martin, J.R.English Text:System and Structure[M].Philadelphia/Amsterdam:John Benjamins, 1992.
[15] Martin, J.R.Meaning beyond the clause:SFL perspectives[J].Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 2002, 22:52-74.
[16] Martin, J.R.Meaning beyond the clause:Co-textual relations[J].Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 2015a, 11(2-3):203-235.
[17] Martin, J.R.Halliday the grammarian:Axial foundations[C]//Webster, J.The Bloomsbury Companion to M.A.K.Halliday.London/New York:Bloomsbury, 2015b.257-290.
[18] Martin, J.R.Meaning matters:A short history of systemic functional linguistics[J].WORD, 2016, 62(1):35-58.
[19] Martin, J.R.Interpersonal meaning:Systemic Functional Linguistics perspectives[J].Functions of Language, 2018, 25(1):2-19.
[20] Martin, J.R.& P.R.R.White.The Language of Evaluation:Appraisal in English[M].Basingstoke/New York:Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
[21] Martin, J.R.& D.Rose.Working with Discourse:Meaning Beyond the Clause (2nd ed.)[M].London/New York:Continuum, 2007.
[22] Martin, J.R.& D.Rose.Genre Relations:Mapping Culture[M].London/Oakville:Equinox, 2008.
[23] Martin, J.R.& B.Quiroz.Systemic functional language typology:A discourse semantic perspective[C]//Martin, J.R., Doran, Y.J.& G.Figueredo.Systemic Functional Language Description:Making Meaning Matter.New York/London:Routledge, 2020.189-237.
[24] Martin, J.R., Wang, P.& Y.Zhu.Systemic Functional Grammar:A Next Step into the Theory-Axial Relations[M].Beijing:Higher Education Press, 2013.
[25] Martin, J.R., Doran, Y.J.& G.Figueredo.Systemic Functional Language Description:Making Meaning Matter[M].New York/London:Routledge, 2020.
[26] Martin, J.R., Quiroz, B.& G.Figueredo.Interpersonal Grammar:Systemic Functional Linguistics Theory and Description[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2021.
[27] Martin, J.R., Quiroz, B.& P.Wang.Systemic Functional Grammar:A Text-Based Description of English, Spanish and Chinese[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, in press.
[28] Matthiessen, C.M.I.M.Descriptive motifs and generalizations[C]//Caffarel, A., Martin, J.R.& C.M.I.M.Matthiessen.Language Typology:A Functional Perspective.Amsterdam/Philadelphia:John Benjamins, 2004.537-673.
[29] Matthiessen, C.M.I.M.Halliday on language[C]//Webster, J.The Bloomsbury Companion to M.A.K.Halliday.London/New York:Bloomsbury, 2015.137-202.
[30] Matthiessen, C.M.I.M.The notion of a multilingual meaning potential:A systemic exploration[C]//Sellami-Baklouti, A.& L.Fontaine.Perspectives from Systemic Functional Linguistics.New York/London:Routledge, 2018.90-120.
[31] Matthiessen, C.M.I.M.& M.A.K.Halliday.Systemic Functional Grammar:A First Step into the Theory[M].Beijing:Higher Education Press, 2009.
[32] Matthiessen, C.M.I.M., Teruya, K.& C.Wu.Multilingual studies as a multi-dimensional space of interconnected language studies[C]//Webster, J.Meaning in Context:Implementing Intelligent Applications of Language Studies.London/New York:Continuum, 2008.146-220.
[33] Mwinlaaru, I.N.& W.W.Xuan.A survey of studies in systemic functional language description and typology[J].Functional Linguistics, 2016, 3(8).
[34] Quiroz, B.The interpersonal and experiential grammar of Chilean Spanish:Towards a principled systemic-functional description based on axial argumentation[D].PhD thesis.The University of Sydney, 2013.
[35] Sinclair, J.M.& R.M.Coulthard.Towards an Analysis of Discourse:The English Used by Teachers and Pupils[M].London:Oxford University Press, 1975.
[36] Teruya, K., Akerejola, E.Andersen, T.H.Caffarel, A.Lavid, J.Matthiessen, C.M.I.M.Petersen, U.H.Patpong, P.& F.Smedegaard Typology of MOOD:A text-based and system-based functional view[C]//Hasan, R., Matthiessen, C.M.I.M.& J.Webster.Continuing Discourse on Language:A Functional Perspective (Vol.2).London/Oakville:Equinox, 2007.859-920.
[37] Teruya, K.& C.M.I.M.Matthiessen.Halliday in relation to language comparison and typology[C]//Webster, J.The Bloomsbury Companion to M.A.K.Halliday.London/New York:Bloomsbury, 2015.427-452.
[38] Ventola, E.The Structure of Social Interaction:A Systemic Approach to the Semiotics of Service Encounters[M].London:Pinter, 1985.
[39] Wang, P.Verbal groups in Manchu:A systemic functional account[J].WORD, 2018, 64(3):157-176.
[40] Wang, P.Axial argumentation and cryptogrammar in interpersonal grammar:A case study of classical Tibetan MOOD[C]//Martin, J.R., Doran, Y.J.& G.Figueredo.Systemic Functional Language Description:Making Meaning Matter.New York/London:Routledge, 2020.73-101.
[41] Wang, P.Interpersonal grammar in Mandarin[C]//Martin, J.R., Quiroz, B.& G.Figueredo.Interpersonal Grammar:Systemic Functional Linguistics Theory and Description.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2021.96-129.
[42] Whorf, B.L.Grammatical categories[J].Language, 1945, 21(1):1-11.
[43] 王勇.SFL的跨语言之旅:机遇和挑战[C]//黄国文, 常晨光, 廖海青.系统功能语言学研究群言集(第2辑).北京:高等教育出版社, 2011.109-120.
[44] 王勇, 徐杰.系统功能语言学与语言类型学[J].外国语, 2011, 34(3):33-41.
[45] 辛志英, 黄国文.系统功能类型学:理论、目标与方法[J].外语学刊, 2010, (5):50-55.
[46] 杨曙, 常晨光.系统功能类型学——类型学之功能视角[J].外语与外语教学, 2013, (4):35-38.
[1] 陆俭明. 再议“汉语名动包含说”[J]. 外国语, 2022, 45(5): 2-14.
[2] 孙崇飞. 名动包含理论存在逻辑问题吗?[J]. 外国语, 2022, 45(5): 15-23.
[3] 高航. 现代汉语工具动量词的指称功能考察:认知语法视角[J]. 外国语, 2022, 45(5): 32-42.
[4] 宋文辉. 重估部分词汇主义研究区分英语真、假结果构式的合理性[J]. 外国语, 2022, 45(4): 18-28.
[5] 王欢, 林正军. 原型范畴视阈下英语方位转换构式量化研究[J]. 外国语, 2022, 45(4): 29-39.
[6] 孟庆楠. 英语半助动词构式历时变化研究──以be supposed to为例[J]. 外国语, 2022, 45(2): 15-26.
[7] 任绍曾. 英语双重谓语的语义蕴含[J]. 外国语, 2022, 45(2): 2-14.
[8] 金立鑫. “名包动”理论的逻辑问题[J]. 外国语, 2022, 45(1): 2-13.
[9] 程倩雯,程琪龙. 动词—构式语义关系的计量分析[J]. 外国语, 2021, 44(6): 2-13.
[10] 孙成娇. 汉语话题结构的类型新议[J]. 外国语, 2021, 44(6): 14-23.
[11] 张天伟, 吴菡. 现代汉语省略结构中焦点副词的作用及其句法语义功能[J]. 外国语, 2021, 44(6): 33-43.
[12] 席建国. 类型学视角下的英语“名词+复杂修饰语”结构翻译探析[J]. 外国语, 2021, 44(6): 44-51.
[13] 朱磊. 分词主导性结构及其句法功能分析[J]. 外国语, 2021, 44(5): 22-32.
[14] 汤敬安,石毓智. 现代汉语的尝试构式[J]. 外国语, 2021, 44(3): 21-30.
[15] 韩巍峰, 石定栩. 上海话典型差比结构的句法层次[J]. 外国语, 2021, 44(3): 31-37.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!