外国语 ›› 2021, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1): 41-63.

• 语言研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

Mapuche People:Valuing a Colonial Past in the Official Primary History Textbook from an Intermodal Perspective of Historical Sources

Teresa Oteíza   

  1. Pontifical Catholic University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-21 出版日期:2021-01-20 发布日期:2021-02-03
  • 作者简介:Teresa Oteíza is an Associate Professor at the Pontifical Catholic University of Chile.Her interests include the areas of social discourse analysis, educational linguistics and systemic functional linguistics.She is currently working on the project The language of appraisal in Spanish:description and systematization of linguistic resources to build intersubjectivity.She published the book El discurso pedagógico de la historia:Un análisis lingüístico sobre la construcción ideológica de la historia de Chile (1970-2001) in 2006, and En (re)construcción:Discurso, identidad y nación en los manuales escolares de historia y de ciencias sociales (ed.with Derrin Pinto) in 2011.Her forthcoming book What to Remember, What to Teach:Human Rights Violations in Chile's Recent Past and the Pedagogical Discourse of History, will be published by Equinox.Email:moteizas@uc.cl

Mapuche People:Valuing a Colonial Past in the Official Primary History Textbook from an Intermodal Perspective of Historical Sources

Teresa Oteíza   

  1. Pontifical Catholic University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
  • Received:2020-04-21 Online:2021-01-20 Published:2021-02-03

摘要: This article explores from an intermodal perspective how visual and verbal historical documents contribute to the construction of value positions regarding the Mapuche people during colonial and early republican times in the latest official 5th grade primary Chilean History textbook.The study analyzes, in particular, the visual and verbal historical secondary sources that build in combination evaluative prosodies that in turn contribute to construct determinate ideological perspectives regarding Mapuche people.The discourse analysis takes a social and ideological intermodal approach (Oteíza & Pinuer 2016, 2019) focusing on an appraisal analysis (Martin & White 2005; Martin 2014; Hood 2010; Oteíza & Pinuer 2012, 2019) informed by socio-semiotic and Systemic Functional Linguistics theories.The cumulative intersemiotic reading of symbolic images and written documents privileges evaluative prosodies of negative integrity and of high conflict, in which Mapuche people are represented with more agency than Hispanics, emphasizing the stereotype of indigenous people as foreign, exotic and brave warriors, but also as violent, primitive and savage people that have had resisted Hispanic desires of slavering and cultural assimilation.Historical secondary sources offer alternative historical interpretations, although mainly constructed by evoked evaluations that could be less evident to children.

关键词: appraisal analysis, intermodal analysis, historical evidence, History textbooks, Mapuche people

Abstract: This article explores from an intermodal perspective how visual and verbal historical documents contribute to the construction of value positions regarding the Mapuche people during colonial and early republican times in the latest official 5th grade primary Chilean History textbook.The study analyzes, in particular, the visual and verbal historical secondary sources that build in combination evaluative prosodies that in turn contribute to construct determinate ideological perspectives regarding Mapuche people.The discourse analysis takes a social and ideological intermodal approach (Oteíza & Pinuer 2016, 2019) focusing on an appraisal analysis (Martin & White 2005; Martin 2014; Hood 2010; Oteíza & Pinuer 2012, 2019) informed by socio-semiotic and Systemic Functional Linguistics theories.The cumulative intersemiotic reading of symbolic images and written documents privileges evaluative prosodies of negative integrity and of high conflict, in which Mapuche people are represented with more agency than Hispanics, emphasizing the stereotype of indigenous people as foreign, exotic and brave warriors, but also as violent, primitive and savage people that have had resisted Hispanic desires of slavering and cultural assimilation.Historical secondary sources offer alternative historical interpretations, although mainly constructed by evoked evaluations that could be less evident to children.

Key words: appraisal analysis, intermodal analysis, historical evidence, History textbooks, Mapuche people

中图分类号: 

  • H030
[1] Achugar, M.2017.Critical discourse analysis and history.In The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Analysis.J.Flowerdew & J.Richardson Eds.(Pp.398-211).London/New York:Routledge.
[2] Baterman, J.2014.Text and Image:A critical introduction to the visual/verbal divide.Abigdon, U.K.:Tylor and Francis.
[3] Bello, A.& M.Rangel.2002.La equidad y la exclusión de los pueblos indígenas y afrodescendientes en América Latina y el Caribe.Revista de la Cepal 76:39-54.
[4] Boccara, G.& I.Seguel.1999.Políticas Indígenas en Chile (siglos XIX y XX).De la asimilación al pluralismo (El Caso Mapuche).Revista de Indias, vol.LIX, (207):741-774.
[5] Boccara, G.& P.Bolados.2010.Qué es el multiculturalismo? La Nueva Cuestión Étnica en el Chile Neoliberal.Revista de Indias, vol.LXX (250):651-690.
[6] Boccara, G.(Ed.) 2002.Colonización, Resistencia y Mestizaje en las Américas (siglos XVI-XX).Quito:Ediciones Abya-Yala.
[7] Burke, P.2005.El uso de la imagen como documento histórico.Barcelona:Crítica.
[8] Coffin, C.2006.Historical Discourse:The Language of Time, Cause and Evaluation.London:Continuum.
[9] Fernández Leiva, C.& G.Giadrosic Reyes.2018.Historia, Geografía y Ciencias Sociales.Texto del estudiante.Ministry of Education of Chile.Government of Chile.Santiago:SM Editores.
[10] Jelin, E.2002.Los trabajos de la memoria.Madrid:Siglo Veintiuno Editores S.A.
[11] Jewitt, C., J.Bezerman & K.O'Halloran.2016.Introducing Multimodality.London:Routledge.
[12] Halliday, M.A.K.1978.Language as a Social Semiotic:The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning.London:Edward Arnold.
[13] Halliday, M.A.K.& C.Matthiessen.2014.An Introduction to Functional Grammar.London:Edward Arnold.
[14] Hernaández, P.2012.Imagen-palabra.Lugar, sujecioón y Mirada en las artes visuals Centroamericanas.Fraáncfort:Vervuert.
[15] Hood, S.2010.Appraising Research:Evaluation in Academic Writing.London:Palgrave Macmillan.
[16] Hood, S.2019.Appraisal.In The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics, G.Thompson, W.Bowcher, L.Fontaine & D.Schonthal Eds.(Pp.382-409).Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
[17] Kress, G.2003.Literacy in the New Media Age.London, New York:Routledge.
[18] Kress, G.2009.Multimodality.A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication.London/New York:Routledge.
[19] Kress, G.& T.Van Leeuwen.2006.Reading Images.The Grammar of Visual Design.London:Routledge.
[20] Kress, G.& T.van Leeuwen.2001.Multimodal Discourse:the modes and media of contemporary communication, New York:Oxford University Press.
[21] Lira, E.2013.Algunas reflexiones a Propósito de los 40 años del Golpe Militar en Chile y las Condiciones de la Reconciliación Política.Psykhe, 22(2), 5-18.doi:10.7764/psykhe.22.2.676
[22] Loveman, B.2001.Chile.The Legacy of Hispanic Capitalism.New York:Oxford University Press.
[23] Mallon, F.2004.La sangre del copihue.La comunidad Mapuche de Nicolás Ailío y el Estado chileno, 1906-2001.Santiango:LOM Editores.
[24] Manghi, D.& C.Badilla.2015.Modos Semióticos en el Discurso Pedagógico de Historia:Potencial Semiótico Para la Mediación en el Aula Escolar.Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura 20(2):157-172.
[25] Martin, J.R.& P.White.2005.The Language of Evaluation.Appraisal in English.New York:Palgrave Macmillan.
[26] Martin, J.R.2019.Discourse semantics.In The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics, G.Thompson, W.Bowcher, L.Fontaine & D.Sch nthal Eds.(Pp.358-381).Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
[27] Martin, J.R.2014.Evolving systemic functional linguistics:beyond the clause, Functional Linguistics, 1(3):1-24.
[28] Martin J.R.2004.Sense and sensibility:Texturing evaluation.In J.A.Foley (ed.) Language, Education and Discourse:Functional Approaches (Pp.142-175).London:Continuum.
[29] Martin, J.R.& D.Rose.2007.Working with Discourse.London:Continuum.Second edition.
[30] Martin, J.R.& P.White.2005.The Language of Evaluation:Appraisal in English.New York:Palgrave Macmillan.
[31] Maturana, C.L.2018.Los ensambles multimodales y los desafíos de la lectura y escritura multimodal en la formación de profesores de enseñanza básica.In Qué leer? Cómo leer? Lectura e Inclusión, MINEDUC, Universidad Católica, 329-336.
[32] Mills, K.& L.Unsworth.2018.Multilingual Literacy.Oxford Research Encyclopedia, Education.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
[33] Oteíza, T.2019.Historical events and processes in the discourse of disciplinary History and classroom interaction.In J.R.Martin, K.Maton and J.Doran (Eds.).Academic Discourse:Systemic Functional Linguistics and Legitimation Code Theory.(Pp.177-207).London/New York:Routledge.
[34] Oteíza, T.2018.Prácticas de la memoria en clases de historia:construcción de la evidencia multimodal e intertextual del pasado reciente chileno.Discurso & Sociedad, 12(1), 112-160.
[35] Oteíza, T.2017a.The Appraisal Framework and discourse analysis.In T.Bartlett & G.O'Grady (Eds.).The Routledge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics.(Pp.457-472).London/New York:Routledge.
[36] Oteíza, T.2017b.Educación pública en Chile y practicas de la memoria:análisis social-ideológico del discurso e interacción en clases de historia.Cadernos de Linguagem e Sociedade (3):144-174.
[37] Oteíza, T.& M.Achugar.2018.History Textbooks and the construction of dictatorship.Palgrave Handbook of Textbook Studies, Eckhardt Fuchs and Annekatrin Bock (Eds.).(Pp.305-318).New York:Palgrave.
[38] Oteíza, T.& C.Castro.2019.Dictatorship and the Cold War in official Chilean History Textbooks.In B.Christophe, P.Gautschi and R.Thorp (Eds.).Teaching the Cold War:International Perspectives on Memory Practices in Educational Media and in the Classroom.(Pp.219-245).New York:Palgrave.
[39] Oteíza, T.& C.Pinuer.2019.El sistema de VALORACIÓN como herramienta teórico-metodológica para el estudio social e ideológico del discurso.Logos 29(2):207-228.
[40] Oteíza, T.& C.Pinuer.2016.Appraisal framework and critical discourse studies:a joint approach to the study of historical memories from an intermodal perspective.International Journal of Language Studies, 10(2):5-32.
[41] Oteíza, T.& C.Pinuer.2012.Prosodia valorativa:construcción de eventos y procesos en el discurso de la historia.Discurso & Sociedad 6(2):418-446.
[42] Painter, C., J.R.Martin & L.Unsworth.2013.Reading Visual Narratives.Image Analysis of Children's Picture Books.Lancaster/Bristol:Equinox.
[43] Ravelli, L.2018.Multimodality and the register of disciplinary History:Challenges for new texts and old theories.Language, Context and Text, 1(2):341-365.
[44] Unsworth, L.2019.Multimodal literacy and large-scale literacy tests:Curriculum relevance and responsibility.Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 42(2):128-139.
[45] Wertsch, J.2002.Voices of Collective Remembering.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
[46] Winn, P., S.Stern, F.Lorenz & A.Marchesi.2014.No hay mañana sin ayer.Batallas por la memoria histórica en el Cono Sur.Santiago:LOM ediciones.
[1] Peter R. R. White. Textual Anticipation and the Putative Reader in Persuasive Discourse[J]. 外国语, 2021, 44(1): 2-20.
[2] Michele Zappavigna. Ambient Affiliation in Comments on YouTube Videos:Communing Around Values About ASMR[J]. 外国语, 2021, 44(1): 21-40.
[3] 周士宏. 东北方言的“嚎”与“嚎字句”——结构层次与认识立场[J]. 外国语, 2020, 43(5): 74-86.
[4] 王军. 从语义关联层面看汉语的时间性特质[J]. 外国语, 2020, 43(4): 44-52.
[5] 王晓婧, 陈新仁. 从边缘到中心——第十六届国际语用学大会主题介评[J]. 外国语, 2020, 43(4): 124-128.
[6] 冉永平, 黄旭. 人际语用学视角下的礼貌与关系[J]. 外国语, 2020, 43(3): 35-45.
[7] 李茨婷, 任伟. 二语语用发展研究的复杂系统建构[J]. 外国语, 2020, 43(3): 46-54.
[8] 武建国, 龚纯, 宋玥. 政治话语的批评隐喻分析——以特朗普演讲为例[J]. 外国语, 2020, 43(3): 80-88.
[9] 李文中. 局部语义韵与话语管理[J]. 外国语, 2019, 42(4): 81-91.
[10] 尚晓明, 程璐璐. 发展语用学视域中的语用障碍问题研究[J]. 外国语, 2019, 42(4): 103-112.
[11] Louise McNally. Scalar Alternatives and Scalar Inference Involving Adjectives: A Comment on van Tiel, et al.(2016)[J]. 外国语, 2019, 42(3): 2-12.
[12] YU Yue, WU Yicheng. Where Semantics Meets Pragmatics: The Incremental Interpretation of Conversational Dialogues[J]. 外国语, 2019, 42(3): 13-25.
[13] LIU Mingming, CUI Yanyan. Situating Mandarin Wh-indefinites in the Typology of Modal Indefinites[J]. 外国语, 2019, 42(3): 26-37.
[14] XIE Zhiguo. The Progressive Aspect as a Polarity Item (Non-)Licenser: A Crosslinguistic Study[J]. 外国语, 2019, 42(3): 38-46.
[15] 罗琼鹏. 语义学与形态句法变异:以英汉语量级等比句为例[J]. 外国语, 2019, 42(3): 47-59.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
[1] 张德禄. 评价理论介入系统中的语法模式研究[J]. 外国语, 2019, 42(2): 2 -10 .
[2] 蒋承勇. 走向融合与融通——跨文化比较与外国文学研究方法更新[J]. 外国语, 2019, 42(1): 103 -110 .
[3] 许钧. 翻译是先锋,语言是利器——五四运动前后的翻译与语言问题[J]. 外国语, 2019, 42(4): 2 -3,6 .
[4] 张懂, 许家金. 英汉与格交替现象的多因素研究[J]. 外国语, 2019, 42(2): 24 -33 .
[5] 李思旭. 处所转换构式的语言类型学研究[J]. 外国语, 2019, 42(1): 2 -24 .
[6] 叶婧婷. 反身领属与强化的类型学考察[J]. 外国语, 2019, 42(1): 25 -38 .
[7] 谢天振. 百年五四与今天的重写翻译史——对重写翻译史的几点思考[J]. 外国语, 2019, 42(4): 4 -6 .
[8] 张莹. 行动者网络理论与中国文化外译——以熊式一英译的Lady Precious Stream(《王宝川》)为例[J]. 外国语, 2019, 42(4): 25 -34 .
[9] 柳俊. 东南亚语言区域的双及物结构类型及其成因[J]. 外国语, 2019, 42(4): 35 -45 .
[10] 雍茜. 违实句中的时制、体貌和语气——兼论语言标记系统的形成、类推和强化[J]. 外国语, 2019, 42(2): 11 -23 .