硬科学论文中we的语义指向及话语行为研究

Semantic References and Discourse Acts of we in Hard Science Articles

  • 摘要: 人称介入是一种人际策略,服务于学术文本的交际目的。在所有人称介入表达中,we的使用最为频繁,语义指向也最复杂。本文基于语料库数据,概括与描述硬科学论文中we的频数分布、语义指向及典型话语行为。研究发现,近年来硬科学作者越来越多地使用we,或突显个人身份,或与读者互动。一些传统的自然科学,如数学和物理,对we的使用频率甚至超过了部分软科学。硬科学论文中的we通常指向4类群体:作者及其研究团队、作者与读者、整个学科和泛指一般人。每类语义指向下的we可搭配不同动词,构成丰富多样的共选型式,以实施多重学术话语行为。本研究可为新手作者提供便捷资源,提高其语言使用的准确度和适切度,因此具有学术英语教学价值。

     

    Abstract: Personal involvement is an interpersonal strategy for the communicative purpose of academic texts.Among all the expressions of personal involvement, the first person we is used far more frequently than any other types and has the most complicated semantics.Based on corpus data, this paper generalizes and describes the characteristics of we in hard science articles with regard to its frequency distributions, semantic references and discourse acts.Findings suggest that in recent years we has been increasingly used in hard science articles either to construct salient authorial identity or to interact with readers; in particular, it has four kinds of semantic references:i.e.writer, writer-reader, the whole discipline, and general people.We under each semantic category can perform multiple academic discourse acts by collocating with different verbs to form various co-selection patterns.This study offers a short-cut for novice academic writers to achieving higher accuracy and idiomaticity in language use.In this sense it may have potentially valuable implications for EAP teaching.

     

/

返回文章
返回