• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国人文社会科学核心期刊
  • 中文社会科学引文索引(CSSCI)来源期刊
  • 国家社会科学基金学术期刊资助入选期刊
公众号 二维码

比附“主谓结构”引起的问题

沈家煊

沈家煊. 比附“主谓结构”引起的问题[J]. 外国语, 2018, 41(6): 2-15.
引用本文: 沈家煊. 比附“主谓结构”引起的问题[J]. 外国语, 2018, 41(6): 2-15.
SHEN Jiaxuan. Problems Caused by Modelling Chinese Grammar on Subject and Predicate[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2018, 41(6): 2-15.
Citation: SHEN Jiaxuan. Problems Caused by Modelling Chinese Grammar on Subject and Predicate[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2018, 41(6): 2-15.

比附“主谓结构”引起的问题

详细信息
    作者简介:

    沈家煊(1946-),男,上海人,硕士,研究员。研究方向:语言学理论。

  • 中图分类号: H043

Problems Caused by Modelling Chinese Grammar on Subject and Predicate

  • 摘要: 说汉语也有"主谓结构",这只是一种比附的说法,因为汉语并没有界定主谓结构的形式标准,所说的"主谓结构"其实是指逻辑上的命题。比附主谓结构并用它来套汉语现象,结果引起许多问题,特别表现在近年来学界讨论的一些热点问题上,主要有施格型、中动式、事件结构、关系从句、话题凸显等五个。布龙菲尔德指出,"语言学研究的一条基本原则是,我们无权在分析一种语言的时候注入这种语言没有表示的区分",要解决存在的问题,我们应该认真考虑在讲汉语语法的时候如何超越主谓结构。
    Abstract: It is only an analogy to say Chinese grammar also has subject and predicate, since the language has no formal criteria defining subject and predicate which exist in Indo-European languages, and what is called ‘S-P structure’ in Chinese refers to proposition in Aristotelian logic.Modelling Chinese grammar on ‘S-P structure’ has caused many problems, especially in the topics arousing general interest and heated argument, such as ergative language, middle construction, event structure, relative clause, and topic prominence.To tackle these problems, we should adhere to the ‘fundamental principle of linguistic study that we have no right to inject into our analysis of a language distinctions not expressed in the language’ as pointed out by L.Bloomfield and seriously consider the possibility of studying Chinese grammar beyond the pre-established categories subject and predicate.
  • [1]

    Bloomfield, L.Subject and predicate[J].Transactions of the American Philological Association, 97, 47:3-22.

    [2]

    Croft, W.Radical Construction Grammar:Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective[M].New York & Oxford:Oxford University Press, 001.

    [3]

    Dixon, R.M.W.The Dyirbal Language of North Queensland[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1972.

    [4]

    Evans, N.& S.C.Levinson.The myth of language universals:Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science[J].Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2009, 32:29-92.

    [5]

    Jakobson, R.Closing statement:linguistics and poetics[C]//Sebeok, T.A.Style in Language, Cambridge.Mass.:The MIT Press,1960.30-377.

    [6]

    Jespersen, O.Language:Its Nature, Development and Origin[M].London:George Allen & Unwin LTD, 1922.

    [7]

    Kampen, J.van.Subject and the Extended Projection Principle[Z]//Brown, Keith.Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics.2nd ed.Vol.12, Amsterdam:Elsevier Ltd., 2006.242-248.

    [8]

    LaPolla, R.J.Arguments against ‘subject’ and ‘direct object’ as viable concepts in Chinese[J].Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, 1993, 63(4):759-13.

    [9]

    LaPolla, R.J.Pragmatic relations and word order in Chinese[C]//Downing, Pamela & Michael Noonan.Word Order in Discourse.Amsterdam/Philadelphia:John Benjamins, 15.27-330.

    [10]

    LaPolla, R.J.& D.Poa.On describing word order[C]//Ameka, F., Dench, A.& N.Evans.Catching Language:The Standing Challenge of Grammar Writing.Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter, 2006.269-295.

    [11]

    Li, C.N.& S.A.Thompson.Subject and topic:a new typology of language[C]//Li, Charles N.Subject and Topic.New York:Academic Press,1976.457-490.

    [12]

    Matthews, P.H.Syntax[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1981.

    [13]

    Palmer, F.Grammatical Roles and Relations[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1994.

    [14]

    Payne, T.E.Describing Morphosyntax:A Guide for Field Linguistics[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1997.

    [15]

    Talmy, L.Toward a Cognitive Semantics.Vols.1&2[M].Cambridge, Massachusetts:The MIT Press, 2000.

    [16] 方梅.汉语口语后置关系从句研究[C]//庆祝《中国语文》创刊50周年学术论文集,北京:商务印书馆,2004.70-78.
    [17] 郭绍虞.汉语语法修辞新探[M].北京:商务印书馆, 1979.
    [18] 刘探宙.一元非作格动词带宾语现象[J].中国语文,2009, (2):110-119.
    [19] 吕叔湘.汉语语法分析问题[M].北京:商务印书馆,79.
    [20] 沈家煊.现代汉语"动补结构"的类型学考察[J].世界汉语教学, 03, (3):17-23.
    [21] 沈家煊."零句"和"流水句"——为赵元任先生诞辰120周年而作[J].中国语文, 2012, (5):403-415.
    [22] 沈家煊.汉语有没有主谓结构[J].现代外语, 2017a, (1):1-13.
    [23] 沈家煊."能简则简"和"分清主次"——语言研究方法论谈[J].南开语言学刊,2017b, (2):1-10.
    [24] 沈力.在汉语中附加成分能充当主语吗?[R].在中国社会科学院语言研究所的报告,2018.
    [25] 宋文辉.主语和话题[M].上海:学林出版社,2018.
    [26] 完权.说"惨败"[J].外语教学与研究,2012, (6):43-50.
    [27] 吴福祥.试说汉语几种富有特色的句法模式——兼论汉语语法特点的探求[J].语言研究, 2012, (1):1-13.
    [28] 严辰松.汉语没有"中动结构"[J].解放军外国语学院学报, 2011, (5):7-12.
    [29] 俞敏.古汉语的"所"字[C]//俞敏语言学论文集.北京:商务印书馆,1999.375-386.
    [30] 张与竞,张幼军.汉译《道行般若经》中的特殊定语[J].古汉语研究, 2018, (2):63-68.
    [31] 赵元任.中国话的文法[M].吕叔湘节译本《汉语口语语法》.北京:商务印书馆,1979.
    [32] 朱德熙.语法答问[M].北京:商务印书馆,1985.
    [33] 朱晓农.同构对言法:中国逻辑如何论证[J].华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, (3):80-97.
计量
  • 文章访问数:  963
  • HTML全文浏览量:  2
  • PDF下载量:  8
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2018-08-25
  • 刊出日期:  2018-11-19

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回