反身领属与强化的类型学考察

叶婧婷

反身领属与强化的类型学考察

叶婧婷

莱比锡大学语言学系, 莱比锡 04109

详细信息

作者简介:
叶婧婷(1989-),女,贵州遵义人,博士。研究方向:语言类型学研究。

中图分类号: H003
计量
- 文章访问数: 1113
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 6
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2017-03-21
- 刊出日期: 2019-01-19

Co-referential Possessors and Intensifiers in World's Languages: A Typological Perspective

YE Jingting

Institute für Linguistik, Leipzig University, Leipzig 04109, Germany

摘要

摘要: 本文考察了65种世界语言中饰名强化形式、施动者指向型强化形式、反身形式以及反身领属形式的跨语言分布，使用语义地图分析四种功能之间的关系，发现以下跨语言共性：反身领属与强化形式的关联度高于其与反身形式的关联度。反身领属跨语言共性主要有两个动因，一方面是由于反身领属和强化在功能上相通，另一方面是由于新格赖斯主义言语交际语用准则的作用。
- 反身领属 /
- 强化 /
- 语义地图 /
- 跨语言共性
Abstract: Based on a sample of 65 world's languages, this study tries to reveal the hidden relationship between co-referential possessors and intensifiers by virtue of the semantic map model.It finds the cross-linguistic tendency that co-referential possessors are more likely to use the same form as intensifiers instead of reflexives.This study tries to explain this cross-linguistic tendency in terms of the principles of Neo-Gricean Pragmatics.
- co-referential possessor /
- intensifier /
- semantic map /
- cross-linguistic tendency

HTML全文

参考文献(25)

[1]	Asher, R.E.& T.C.Kumari.Malayalam[M].London:Routledge, 1997.
[2]	Borg, Albert & Maarie Azzopardi-Alexander.Maltese[M].London:Routledge, 1997.
[3]	Croft, William.Typology and Universals[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2002.
[4]	Cysouw, Michael Alexander.Building semantic maps:the case of person marking[C]//Miestamo, Matti & Bernhard Wälchli.New Challenges in Typology:Broadening the Horizons and Redefining the Foundations.Berlin:Mouton, 2007.225-248.
[5]	Donohue, Mark.A Grammar of Tukang Besi[M].Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter, 1999.
[6]	Faltz, Leonard.Reflexivization:A study in universal syntax[D].Berkeley, 1977.
[7]	Gast, Volker, Daniel Hole, Ekkehard König, Peter Siemund & Stephen Töpper.Typological database of intensifiers and reflexives[OL].2007.http://www.tdir.org.[2017-03-01]
[8]	Gast, Volker & P.Siemund.Rethinking the relationship between SELF-intensifiers and reflexives[J].Linguistics, 2006, 44(2):343-381.
[9]	Haspelmath,Martin.The geometry of grammatical meaning:semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison[C]//Tomasello, Michael.The New Psychology of languages:Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure Vol 2.Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum, 2003.211-242.
[10]	Haspelmath, Martin.A Frequentist Explanation of Some Universals of Reflexive Marking[J].Linguistic Discovery, 2008, 6(1):40-63.
[11]	Haspelmath,Martin.Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies[J].Language, 2010, (3):663-687.
[12]	König,Ekkehard & Volker Gast.Focused assertion of identity:A typology of intensifiers[J].Linguistic Typology, 2006, 10(2):223-276.
[13]	König,Ekkehard & Peter Siedmund.Intensifiers and reflexives, a typological perspective[C]//Frajzingier, Zygmunt & Traci S.Curl.Reflexives:Forms and Functions.Amsterdam:John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2000.41-74.
[14]	König, Ekkehard & Peter Siemund (with Stephan Töpper).Intensifiers and reflexive pronouns[C]//Dryer, Matthew S.& Martin Haspelmath.The World Atlas of Language Structures.Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2005.194-197.
[15]	Levinson, Stephen C.Pragmatic reduction of the Binding Conditions revisited[J].Journal of Linguistics, 1991, (1):107-161.
[16]	Lyutikova, E.Reflexives and emphasis in Tsaxur[C]//Frajzingier, Zygmunt & Traci S.Curl.Reflexives:Forms and Functions.Amsterdam:John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2000.227-256.
[17]	Nolan, Brian.Reflexive and reciprocal constructions in modern Irish[D].Dublin:MS.Institute of Technology Blanchardstown, 2001.
[18]	Pica, P.On the nature of the reflexivization cycle[C]//Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society, 1987, 17(2):483-500.
[19]	Schladt,Mathias.The typology and grammaticalization of reflexives[C]//Frajzingier, Zygmunt & Traci S.Curl.Reflexives:Forms and Functions.Amsterdam:John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2000.103-124.
[20]	陈振宇, 陈振宁.通过地图分析揭示语法学中的隐性规律——"加权最少边地图"[J].中国语文,2015,(5):428-438.
[21]	程工.从汉语"自己"一词的历时性演变看新格赖斯主义语用照应理论[J].解放军外国语学院学报, 1994,(6):10-22.
[22]	程工.汉语"自己"一词的性质[J].当代语言学, 1999, (2):33-43.
[23]	郭锐.概念空间和语义地图:语义变异和演变的限制和路径[J].对外汉语研究, 2012, (8):96-130.
[24]	郭锐.语义地图中概念的最小关联原则和关联度[C]//汉语多功能语法形式的语义地图研究.商务印书馆, 2015.
[25]	胡建华, 潘海华.NP显著性的计算与汉语反身代词"自己"的指称[J].当代语言学, 2002, (1):46-60.