叙事话语的社会生态效应——基于科幻小说《地狱》的评价解读

彭宣维

叙事话语的社会生态效应——基于科幻小说《地狱》的评价解读

彭宣维

深圳大学外国语学院, 深圳 518060

详细信息

作者简介:
彭宣维(1963-),男,博士,教授,博士生导师。研究方向:功能语言学。

中图分类号: H04
计量
- 文章访问数: 1197
- HTML全文浏览量: 10
- PDF下载量: 3
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2018-01-12
- 刊出日期: 2019-07-19

Socio-Ecological Efficacies of Narrative Discourse: An appraisal approach to the science fiction Gehenna

PENG Xuanwei

School of Foreign Languages, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China

摘要

摘要: 本文从意义生成角度讨论叙事话语的社会生态效应,出发点是系统功能语言学的三元功能,个案是科幻叙事文本《地狱》。作者试图说明:《地狱》从非同寻常的多维角度讲述故事,构拟出一个离奇怪异的概念符号世界,是非生态的,但旨在确立一种到多种社会价值观念,以对立统一的方法解说相应的个体异化与社会行为的共生现象,体现的是一种非生态意义,却可能存在积极生态动机；而组织上述经验和人际意义的独特方式,具有添加新的主位化与信息化的作用,由此为语言资源提供累增契机,产生积极生态价值。最后,作者就系统功能语言学途径的生态话语研究范围与识别标准以及今后的研究方向给出了己见。
- 和谐生态性 /
- 评价动因 /
- 叙事话语 /
- 元功能 /
- 意义生成
Abstract: This paper discusses the socio-ecological efficacy of narrative discourse from the semogenic perspective.The theoretical vantage point is the three metafunctions of language categorized by Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL), and the illustrative text is a narrative discourse titled Gehenna.It argues that, in Gehenna, the ideational semiotic world created there is odd and fantastic from alternative ways of story telling, the purpose of which is, however, to enact one or more than one social value to account for the dialectic symbiosis of individual alienations and social behaviours.Meanwhile, the unique way of text organization of the above two aspects of meaning has the significance of adding new ways of thematization and informationalization, which provides an opportunity to increase the linguistic resources.It follows that the socio-ecological motive of a narrative text is multi-functional and cannot be simply claimed to be positive or negative in ecologicality.The paper concludes with the scope and observation criteria of ecolinguistics and envisions its future research prospects from the SFL perspective.
- harmonious ecologicality /
- appraisal motive /
- narrative discourse /
- metafunction /
- semogensis

HTML全文

参考文献(35)

[1]	Ferré, F.Being and Value:Toward a Constructive Postmodern Metaphysics[M].Albany:State University of New York Press, 1996.
[2]	Halliday, M.A.K.Language as Social Semiotic:the Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning [M].London:Edward Arnold, 1978.
[3]	Halliday, M.A.K.An Introduction to Functional Grammar[M].London:Arnold, 1985/1994.
[4]	Halliday, M.A.K.Language and the order of nature[C]//Fabb, N., Attridge, D., Durant, A.& C.MacCabe.The Linguistics of Writing:Arguments between Language and Literature.Manchester:Manchester University Press, 1987.135-154.Reprinted in J.J.Webster (ed.), 2003.116-138.
[5]	Halliday, M.A.K.Some grammatical problems in scientific English[J].Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 1989, (6):13-37.Reprinted in J.J.Webster (ed.), 2004.159-180.
[6]	Halliday, M.A.K.New ways of meaning:the challenge to applied linguistics[J].Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1990, (6):7-16.Reprinted in J.J.Webster (ed.) On Language and Linguistics, Volume 3 in the Collected Works of M.A.K.Halliday[C].London:Continuum, 2003.139-174.
[7]	Halliday, M.A.K.Things and relations:regrammaticizing experience as technical knowledge[C]//Martin, J.R.& R.Veel.Reading Science:Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourse of Science.London & New York:Routledge, 1998.185-235.Reprinted in J.J.Webster (ed.) The Language of Science, Volume 5 in the Collected Works of M.A.K.Halliday.London:Continuum, 2004.49-101.
[8]	Halliday, M.A.K.The grammatical construction of scientific knowledge:the framing of the English clause[C]//Favretti, R.R., Sandri, G.& R.Scazzieri.Incommensurability and Translation:Kuhnian Perspectives on Scientific Communication and Theory Change.Cheltenham:Elgar, 1999.85-116.Reprinted in J.J.Webster (ed.), 2004.102-134.
[9]	Halliday,M.A.K.Is the grammar neutral? Is the grammarian neutral?[C]//Villiers, J.de & R.J.Stainton.Communication in Linguistics, Volume 1 of Papers in Honour of Michael Gregory.Toronto:Editions du Gref,2001.179-204.Reprinted in J.J.Webster (ed.), 2003.271-292.
[10]	Halliday, M.A.K.Applied linguistics as an evolving theme[C]//Webster, J.J.Language and Education, Volume 9 in the Collected Works of M.A.K.Halliday.London:Continuum, 2007.1-19.
[11]	Halliday, M.A.K.On Language and Linguistics, Volume 3 in the Collected Works of M.A.K.Halliday [C].Webster J.J.London:Continuum, 2003.
[12]	Halliday, M.A.K.The Language of Science, Volume 5 in the Collected Works of M.A.K.Halliday [C].Webster, J.J.London:Continuum, 2004.
[13]	Haugen, E.The Ecology of Language[C].Palo Alto:Stanford University Press, 1972.
[14]	Martin, J.R.English Text:System and Structure[M].Amsterdam:Benjamins, 1992.
[15]	Martin, J.R.& P.White.The Language of Evaluation:Appraisal in English[M].Hampshire & New York:Macmillan, 2005.
[16]	Peng, X.-W.‘(Text as) wording’ as wording in text size:Stretching lexicogrammatical rank hierarchy from clause to text.Word, 2017, (2):136-172.
[17]	Stibbe,A.Ecolinguistics:Language,Ecology,and the Stories We Live by[M].London:Routledge, 2015.
[18]	陈世丹.虚构亦真实——美国后现代主义小说研究[M].北京:外语教学与研究出版社, 2005.
[19]	陈小红.什么是文学的生态批评[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社, 2013.
[20]	格伦·洛夫.实用生态批评:文学、生物学及环境[M].胡志红、王敬民、徐长勇, 译.北京:北京大学出版社, 2003/2010.
[21]	凯特·里格比.生态批评[C]//21世纪批评述介Julian Wolfreys著.张琼、张冲, 译.南京:南京大学出版社,2002.201-206
[22]	胡志红.西方生态批评史[M].北京:人民出版社, 2015.
[23]	黄国文.生态语言学研究与语言研究者的社会责任[J].暨南学报,2016, (6):10-14.
[24]	黄国文.论生态话语和行为分析的假定和原则[J].外语教学与研究,2017, (6):880-889.
[25]	黄国文, 赵蕊华.生态话语分析的缘起、目标、原则与方法[J].现代外语, 2017, (5):585-596.
[26]	纪秀明.论当代西方生态文学的乌托邦叙事[J].外语教学,2012, (6):84-87.
[27]	刘青汉.生态文学[M].北京:人民出版社, 2012.
[28]	彭宣维.评价文体学[M].北京:北京大学出版社, 2015.
[29]	王诺.欧美生态文学[M].北京:北京大学出版社, 2003.
[30]	王诺.欧美生态批评:生态学研究概论[M].上海:学林出版社, 2008.
[31]	王诺.生态批评与生态思想[M].北京:人民出版社, 2013.
[32]	朱新福.美国经典作家的生态视域和自然思想[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社, 2015.
[33]	张德禄, 郭恩华.多模态话语分析的双重视角——社会符号观与概念隐喻观的连接与互补[J].外国语,2012, (3):20-28.
[34]	张晓琴.中国当代生态文学研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社, 2013.
[35]	周文娟.中国语境下生态语言学研究的理念与实践——黄国文生态语言学研究述评[J].西安外国语大学学报,2017, (3):24-28.