临床语用学研究的交叉视野与融合方法

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

临床语用学是一门新兴的临床语言学分支学科，承担基础性描写、机制性阐释和应用性诊疗三大学科使命，具备鲜明的学科交叉特征。临床语用学结合语言学内部的多层视角，刻画语用障碍表现的特征规律；与外部其他学科交叉，衍生出认知语用、神经语用维度，阐释语用障碍的发生机制；与社会语用、心理计量、认知心理等多个其他学科相结合，实现语用障碍的评估诊断和干预治疗。在新的发展阶段，临床语用学的学科视野拓展与知识体系构建主要通过结合神经生理实验、融合计算机信息技术与运用社会科学统计方法等得以实现。建立学科交叉的研究视野和融合性的研究方法，不仅有助于深化临床语用学的学科内涵，还可提高语言学服务临床实践的质量，兼具学理意义和应用价值。

关键词: 临床语用学, 语用障碍, 学科交叉视野, 融合方法, 学科内涵

Abstract:

Clinical pragmatics is an emerging sub-discipline of clinical linguistics, providing basic description, mechanism explanation and applied diagnosis and treatment, and therefore explicitly exhibiting its distinctive interdisciplinary features. To complete the three major disciplinary missions, clinical pragmatics combines a multi-layered perspective within linguistics to characterize the patterns of pragmatic disorders; it intersects with other external disciplines, such as cognitive pragmatics and neuro-pragmatics, to elucidate the mechanisms underlying pragmatic disorders; it also integrates with social pragmatics, psychometrics, cognitive psychology to assess and intervene in pragmatic disorders. In its new developmental stage, the scope of clinical pragmatics has expanded, and its knowledge system has been constructed through neurophysiological experiments, computer and communication technology, and statistical methods from social sciences. Establishing interdisciplinary research perspectives and integrative research methods not only deepens the disciplinary connotation of clinical pragmatics, but also improves the quality of linguistic services in clinical practices, with both theoretical significance and practical values.

Key words: clinical pragmatics, pragmatic impairment, interdisciplinary perspectives, integrative approaches, disciplinary connotation

中图分类号:

H030

黄立鹤,姚权. 临床语用学研究的交叉视野与融合方法[J]. 外国语, 2024, 47(2): 19-30.

Lihe HUANG,Quan YAO. Clinical Pragmatics: Interdisciplinary Perspectives and Integrative Approaches[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2024, 47(2): 19-30.

参考文献 0

	Agostoni, G., Bambini, V., Bechi, M., Buonocore, M. & M. Bosia. Communicative-pragmatic abilities mediate the relationship between cognition and daily functioning in schizophrenia [J]. Neuropsychology, 2021, 35(1): 42–56.
	Asada, K., Itakura, S., Okanda, M., Moriguchi, Y., Yokawa, K., Kumagaya, S., Konishi, K. & Y. Konishi. Understanding of the Gricean maxims in children with autism spectrum disorder: Implications for pragmatic language development [J]. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 2022, 63: 101085.
	Bambini, V., Agostoni, G., Buonocore, M., Tonini, E., Bechi, M., Ferri, I., Sapienza, J., Martini, F., Cuoco, F., Cocchi, F., Bischetti, L., Cavallaro, R. & M. Bosia. It is time to address language disorders in schizophrenia: A RCT on the efficacy of a novel training targeting the pragmatics of communication (PragmaCom) [J]. Journal of Communication Disorders, 2022, 97: 106196.
	Baraldi, M. A., Avanzino, L., Pelosin, E., Domaneschi, F., Paola, S. D. & G. Lagravinese. Pragmatic abilities in early Parkinson’ s disease [J]. Brain and Cognition, 2021, 150: 105706.
	Bender, E. N., Savundranayagam, M. Y., Murray, L. & J. B. Orange. Supportive strategies for nonverbal communication with persons living with dementia: A scoping review [J]. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 2022, 136: 104365.
	Bosco, F. M., Angeleri, R., Zuffranieri, M., Bara, B. G. & K. Sacco. Assessment Battery for Communication: Development of two equivalent forms [J]. Journal of Communication Disorders, 2012, 45(4): 290–303.
	Camia, M., Benassi, E., Giovagnoli, S. & M. Scorza. Specific learning disorders in young adults: Investigating pragmatic abilities and their relationship with theory of mind, executive functions and quality of life [J]. Research in developmental disabilities, 2022, 126: 104253.
	Cicone, M., Wapner, W., Foldi, N., Zurif, E. & H. Gardner. The relation between gesture and language in aphasic communication [J]. Brain and Language, 1979, 8(3): 324–349.
	Çiray, R. O., Özyurt, G., Turan, S., Karagöz, E., Ermiş, Ç., Öztürk, Y. & A. Akay. The association between pragmatic language impairment, social cognition and emotion regulation skills in adolescents with ADHD [J]. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 2022, 76(2): 89–95.
	Cummings, L. Clinical Pragmatics[M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
	Cummings, L. Pragmatic disorders and social functioning: A lifespan perspective[C]// Capone, A. & J. L. Mey. Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society. Springer International Publishing, 2016. 179–208.
	Cummings, L. Research in Clinical Pragmatics [M]. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG, 2017.
	Daniluk, B. & A. R. Borkowska. Pragmatic aspects of verbal communication in elderly people: A study of Polish seniors International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 2020 55 4 493 505 Daniluk, B. & A. R. Borkowska. Pragmatic aspects of verbal communication in elderly people: A study of Polish seniors[J]. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 2020, 55(4): 493−505.
	Field, T. S., Newton-Mason, S. M., Shajan, S., Barral, O., Jang, H., Soroski, T., O’ Neill, Z., Conati, C. & G. Carenini. Machine learning analysis of speech and eye tracking data to distinguish Alzheimer’ s clinic patients from healthy controls [J]. Alzheimer’ s Dementia, 2020, 16(s5): e046742.
	Gallagher, T. M. & B. A. Darnton. Conversational aspects of the speech of language-disordered children: Revision behaviors Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1978 21 1 118 135 Gallagher, T. M. & B. A. Darnton. Conversational aspects of the speech of language-disordered children: Revision behaviors[J]. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1978, 21(1): 118−135. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2101.118
	Gallagher, T. M. Clinical pragmatics: Expectations and realizations Canadian Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology 1990 14 1 3 6 Gallagher, T. M. Clinical pragmatics: Expectations and realizations[J]. Canadian Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 1990, 14(1): 3−6.
	Gerstenberg, A. Pragmatic development in the (middle and) later stages of life [C]// Schneider, K. & E. Ifantidou. Developmental and Clinical Pragmatics. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2020. 209–234.
	Graves, W. W., Levinson, H., Coulanges, L., Cahalan, S., Cruz, D., Sancimino, C., Bal, V. H. & M. Rosenberg-Lee. Neural differences in social and figurative language processing on the autism spectrum [J]. Neuropsychologia, 2022, 171: 108240.
	Happé, F. Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism: A test of relevance theory Cognition 1993 48 2 101 119 Happé, F. Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism: A test of relevance theory[J]. Cognition, 1993, 48(2): 101−119. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90026-R
	Häuser, K. I., Titone, D. A. & S. R. Baum. The role of the ventro-lateral prefrontal cortex in idiom comprehension: An rTMS study [J]. Neuropsychologia, 2016, 91: 360–370.
	Healey, M., Howard, E., Ungrady, M., Olm, C. A., Nevler, N., Irwin, D. J. & M. Grossman. More than words: Extra-Sylvian neuroanatomic networks support indirect speech act comprehension and discourse in Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia[J/OL]. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2021: 14[2022-11-14]. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2020.598131.
	Huang, Lihe & Yiran Che. Pragmatic impairment and multimodal compensation in older adults with dementia. Language and Health. 2023, 1(1): 44−57.
	Kato, S., Hanawa, K., Linh, V. P., Saito, M., Iimura, R. & K. Inui. Toward mapping pragmatic impairment of autism spectrum disorder individuals through the development of a corpus of spoken Japanese [J]. PLoS ONE, 2022, 17(2): e0264204.
	Keegan, L. C., Suger, C. & L. Togher. Discourse analysis of humor after traumatic brain injury[J]. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 2021, 30(2): 949−961.
	Kong, W., Jang, H., Carenini, G. & T. S. Field. Exploring neural models for predicting dementia from language [J]. Computer Speech & Language, 2021, 68: 101181.
	Lanzi, A. M., Saylor, A. K., Fromm, D., Liu, H., MacWhinney, B. & M. L. Cohen. DementiaBank: Theoretical rationale, protocol, and illustrative analyses [J]. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 2023, 32(2): 426–438.
	Leinonen, E. & D. Kerbel. Relevance theory and pragmatic impairment International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 1999 34 4 367 390 Leinonen, E. & D. Kerbel. Relevance theory and pragmatic impairment[J]. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 1999, 34(4): 367−390.
	Looze, C. D., Dehsarvi, A., Crosby, L., Vourdanou, A., Coen, R. F., Lawlor, B. A. & R. B. Reilly. Cognitive and structural correlates of conversational speech timing in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Mild-to-Moderate Alzheimer’ s Disease: Relevance for early detection approaches [J]. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 2021, 13: 637404.
	Luzzi, S., Baldinelli, S., Ranaldi, V., Fiori, C., Plutino, A., Fringuelli, F. M., Silvestrini, M., Baggio, G. & C. Reverberi. The neural bases of discourse semantic and pragmatic deficits in patients with frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer’ s disease [J]. Cortex, 2020, 128: 174–191.
	Maessen, B., Rombouts, E., Maes, B. & I. Zink. Influence of gestures on the intelligibility and comprehensibility of utterances with stuttering events in individuals with Down syndrome [J]. Journal of Communication Disorders, 2022, 95: 106178.
	Mok, Z., Steel, G., Russell, C. & E. Conway. Measuring the interactions of people with dementia and their conversation partners: A preliminary adaption of the Kagan measures of support and participation in conversation [J]. Aging & Mental Health, 2021, 25(1): 13–21.
	Suarez Moreno, A., Nguyen, J. -P., Calmelet, A., Le Saout, E., Damier, P., de Decker, L., Malineau, C., Nizard, J., Canoui-Poitrine, F. & J. -P. Lefaucheur. Multi-site rTMS with cognitive training improves apathy in the long term in Alzheimer’ s disease: A 4-year chart review[J]. Clinical Neurophysiology, 2022, 137: 75–83.
	Nelson, M. E., Jester, D. J., Petkus, A. J. & R. Andel. Cognitive Reserve, Alzheimer’ s neuropathology, and risk of Dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Neuropsychology Review, 2021, 31(2): 233–250.
	Olthof-Nefkens, M. W. L. J., Derksen, E. W. C., Debets, F., de Swart, B. J. M., Nijhuis-van der Sanden, M. W. G. & J. G. Kalf. Com-mens: A home-based logopaedic intervention program for communication problems between people with dementia and their caregivers — A single-group mixed-methods pilot study [J]. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 2023, 58(3): 704−722.
	Orso, B., Mattei, C., Arnaldi, D., Massa, F., Serafini, G., Plantone, D., Doglione, E., Grafman, J., Nobili, F. & M. Pardini. Clinical and MRI predictors of conversion from mild behavioural impairment to Dementia [J]. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 2020, 28(7): 755–763.
	Parola, A., Bosco, F. M., Gabbatore, I., Galetto, V. & A. Marini. The impact of the cognitive pragmatic treatment on the pragmatic and informative skills of individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) [J]. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 2019, 51: 53–62.
	Pereira, A. M., Campos, B. M., Coan, A. C., Pegoraro, L. F., de Rezende, T. J. R., Obeso, I., Dalgalarrondo, P., da Costa, J. C., Dreher, J. -C. & F. Cendes. Differences in cortical structure and functional MRI connectivity in high functioning autism [J]. Frontiers in Neurology, 2018, 9: 539.
	Perkins, M. R. Clinical pragmatics [C]// Östman, J. & J. Verschueren. Handbook of Pragmatics (vol. 15). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2011. 1–32.
	Perkins, M. R. Pragmatic Impairment [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
	Perkins, M. R. The scope of pragmatic disability: A cognitive approach [C]// Müller, N. Pragmatics in Speech and Language Pathology: Studies in Clinical Applications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2000. 7–28.
	Qian, L., Shao, H., Fang, H., Xiao, T., Ding, N., Sun, B., Gao, H., Tang, M., Ye, M., Ke, X. & D. K. O’ Neill. Reliability, validity, and developmental sensitivity of the Language Use Inventory (LUI) in the Chinese context[J]. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 2022, 57(3): 497– 511.
	Saldert, C. ., Johansson, C. & R. Wilkinson. An interaction-focused intervention approach to training everyday communication partners: A single case study Aphasiology 2015 29 3 378 399 Saldert, C., Johansson, C. & R. Wilkinson. An interaction-focused intervention approach to training everyday communication partners: A single case study[J]. Aphasiology, 2015, 29(3): 378−399. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2014.948803
	Smith, B. R. & E. K. Leinonen. Clinical Pragmatics: Unravelling the Complexities of Communicative Failure [M]. London: Chapman and Hall, 1992.
	Snow, P. C., Bagley, K. & D. White. Speech-language pathology intervention in a youth justice setting: Benefits perceived by staff extend beyond communication [J]. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 2018, 20(4): 458–467.
	Snowdon, D. A., Kemper, S. J., Mortimer, J. A., Greiner, L. H., Wekstein, D. R. & W. R. Markesbery. Linguistic ability in early life and cognitive function and Alzheimer’ s disease in late life: Findings from the Nun Study [J]. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1996, 275(7): 528–532.
	Struckmann, W., Bodén, R., Gingnell, M., Fällmar, D. & J. Persson. Modulation of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex functional connectivity after intermittent theta-burst stimulation in depression: Combining findings from fNIRS and fMRI [J]. NeuroImage: Clinical, 2022, 34: 103028.
	Tessier, A., Claire, C., Guylaine, L. D., Emma, P. & W. Mélanie. Exploring the effects of a communication partner training programme for adapted transport drivers [J]. Aphasiology, 2021, 37(13): 1–26.
	Wilcox, M. J. & G. A. Davis. Speech Act Analysis of Aphasic Communication in Individual and Group Settings[C]// Brookshire, R. H. Clinical Aphasiology Conference proceedings. Minncapolis. MN: BRK Publishers, 1977. 166–174.
	Zhao, J., Cai, W., Su, J., Lin, R., Ma, M. & H. Li. The effect of creative expression program in neurocognitive networks performance measured by task and resting-state functional MRI [J]. International Psychogeriatrics, 2023, 35(8): 411−420.
	Zhu, L. & L. Huang. Pathological verbal repetition by Chinese elders with dementia of Alzheimer’ s type: A functional perspective East Asian Pragmatics 2019 5 2 169 193 Zhu, L. & L. Huang. Pathological verbal repetition by Chinese elders with dementia of Alzheimer’ s type: A functional perspective[J]. East Asian Pragmatics, 2019, 5(2): 169−193.
	陈平. 理论语言学、语言交叉学科与应用研究: 观察与思考当代修辞学 2020 221 5 1 18 陈平. 理论语言学、语言交叉学科与应用研究:观察与思考[J]. 当代修辞学,2020,221(5): 1−18.
	侯婷婷, 陈潇, 孔德彭等. 机器学习在自闭症儿童早期识别和诊断领域的应用心理科学进展 2022 30 10 2321 2340 侯婷婷,陈潇,孔德彭等. 机器学习在自闭症儿童早期识别和诊断领域的应用[J]. 心理科学进展,2022,30(10): 2321−2340. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3710.2022.10.xlxdt202210015
	黄立鹤. 老龄化与老年语言学引论[M]. 上海:上海外语教育出版社,2022.
	黄立鹤, 杨晶晶. 基于Coh–Metrix的汉语阿尔茨海默病患者语篇语用障碍分析语言文字应用 2022 121 1 134 144 黄立鹤,杨晶晶. 基于Coh–Metrix的汉语阿尔茨海默病患者语篇语用障碍分析[J]. 语言文字应用,2022,121(1): 134−144. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-5397.2022.1.yywzyy202201014
	靳羽西, 梁丹丹. 高功能自闭症儿童不同常规度转喻加工的发展: 来自ERP的证据心理科学 2022 45 4 871 878 靳羽西,梁丹丹. 高功能自闭症儿童不同常规度转喻加工的发展:来自ERP的证据[J]. 心理科学,2022,45(4): 871−878.
	康一奇, 种霞, 吴南. 自闭症早期预警: 联合注意和共情的发生发展及影响因素心理科学进展 2018 26 7 1223 1231 康一奇,种霞,吴南. 自闭症早期预警:联合注意和共情的发生发展及影响因素[J]. 心理科学进展,2018,26(7): 1223−1231.
	马廷辉. 语用学研究的神经科学进路——神经语用学研究外国语 2023 46 4 56 67 马廷辉. 语用学研究的神经科学进路−神经语用学研究[J]. 外国语,2023,46(4): 56−67. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5139.2023.04.006
	冉永平, 李欣芳. 临床语用学视角下语用障碍的交叉研究外国语 2017 40 2 28 38 冉永平,李欣芳. 临床语用学视角下语用障碍的交叉研究[J]. 外国语,2017,40(2): 28−38.
	尚晓明, 程璐璐. 发展语用学视域中的语用障碍问题研究外国语 2019 42 4 103 112 尚晓明,程璐璐. 发展语用学视域中的语用障碍问题研究[J]. 外国语,2019,42(4): 103−112. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5139.2019.04.014
	辛自强, 林崇德. 微观发生法: 聚焦认知变化心理科学进展 2002 2 206 212 辛自强,林崇德. 微观发生法:聚焦认知变化[J]. 心理科学进展,2002,(2): 206−212. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3710.2002.02.012
	周德宇, 黄立鹤. 语用障碍多模态补偿的功能与机制现代外语 2023 46 1 15 28 周德宇,黄立鹤. 语用障碍多模态补偿的功能与机制[J]. 现代外语,2023,46(1): 15−28.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

[1]	尚晓明, 程璐璐. 发展语用学视域中的语用障碍问题研究[J]. 外国语, 2019, 42(4): 103-112.
[2]	冉永平, 李欣芳. 临床语用学视角下语用障碍的交叉研究[J]. 外国语, 2017, 40(2): 28-38.