Journal of Foreign Languages ›› 2024, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2): 50-59.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Rhetorical Markers and Background Propositions

Zhijun LU1,Dingxu SHI2   

  1. 1. School of Foreign Languages,Guangdong University of Technology,Guangzhou 510006,China
    2. Center for Linguistics & Applied Linguistics,Guangdong University of Foreign Studies,Guangzhou 510420,China
  • Received:2022-07-14 Online:2024-03-20 Published:2024-03-25

Abstract:

This thesis attempts to explain the mismatch between the structural form and its deep expression exhibited by na rhetorical questions from the syntax-semantic interface. The speaker uses the na rhetorical question in conversation to express the mirativity toward the background proposition of the question, and then uses the local proposition to express the illocutionary negative assertion. The syntactic environment (intonational yes-no questions) of na rhetorical questions expresses the interrogative force, but the na rhetorical questions express the illocutionary negative assertion. The lexical factor of this force shift is na’s strong negative polarity, but its syntactic factor is the three dependencies triggered by na’s strong negative polarity: de-Q operation, covert movement and illocutionary negative assertion.

Key words: na, rhetorical marker, background proposition, strong negative polarity, illocutionary negative assertion

CLC Number: 

  • H030

"

背景命题p=λw:我有工夫看小说 in w
本句命题?p:我没有工夫看小说
“哪”的言外语力1.FALSUM(p)
2. 将?p 纳入 CG
3. ts ∈TARGET(tl)
Cheng, Y. L. & J. Rooryck. Licensing wh-in-situ Syntax 2000 3 1 1 19 Cheng, Y. L. & J. Rooryck. Licensing wh-in-situ[J]. Syntax, 2000, 3(1): 1−19.
doi: 10.1111/1467-9612.00022
Cheung, Y. L. Negative wh-construction and its semantic properties Journal of East Asian Linguistics 2009 18 4 297 321 Cheung, Y. L. Negative wh-construction and its semantic properties[J]. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 2009, 18(4): 297−321.
doi: 10.1007/s10831-009-9051-2
Drubig, H. B. Focus and Connectedness: Towards a Typology of Focus Constructions [M]. Ms. University of Tübingen, 1998.
Giannakidou, A. & L. S. Cheng. (In)definiteness, polarity, and the role of wh-morphology in free choice Journal of Semantics 2006 23 2 135 183 Giannakidou, A. & L. S. Cheng. (In)definiteness, polarity, and the role of wh-morphology in free choice[J]. Journal of Semantics, 2006, 23(2): 135−183.
doi: 10.1093/jos/ffl001
Han, C. H. Interpreting interrogatives as rhetorical questions Lingua 2002 112 3 201 229 Han, C. H. Interpreting interrogatives as rhetorical questions[J]. Lingua, 2002, 112(3): 201−229.
doi: 10.1016/S0024-3841(01)00044-4
Hsieh, M. L. Form and meaning: Negation and question in Chinese [D]. Los Angeles: University of Southern California, 2001.
Krifka, M. Negated polarity questions as denegations of assertions [C] // Kiefer F. & C. M. Lee. Contrastiveness and Scalar Implicatures. Springer, 2012. 359−398.
Pan, J. N. Deriving head-final order in the peripheral domain of Chinese Linguistic Inquiry 2022 53 1 121 154 Pan, J. N. Deriving head-final order in the peripheral domain of Chinese[J]. Linguistic Inquiry, 2022, 53(1): 121−154.
doi: 10.1162/ling_a_00396
Repp, S. Common ground management: Modal particles, illocutionary negation, and VERUM [C] // Gutzmann, D. & H. M. Gartner. Beyond Expressives: Explorations in Use-Conditional Meaning. Leiden: Brill, 2013. 231−274.
Rett, J. Exclamatives, degrees and speech acts Linguistics and Philosophy 2011 34 5 411 442 Rett, J. Exclamatives, degrees and speech acts[J]. Linguistics and Philosophy, 2011, 34(5): 411−442.
doi: 10.1007/s10988-011-9103-8
Rizzi, L. Locality and left periphery [C] // Belletti A. Structures and Beyond. Boston and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. 104−131.
Sadock, J. M. Queclaratives Papers from the Seventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 1971 7 223 232 Sadock, J. M. Queclaratives[J]. Papers from the Seventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 1971, (7): 223−232.
von Fintel, K. Modality and language [C] // Borchert, D. M. Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2nd edn. ). Detroit: MacMillan Reference, 2006. 20–27.
蔡维天. 汉语的语气显著性和隐性模态范畴 语言科学 2019 18 1 1 12 蔡维天. 汉语的语气显著性和隐性模态范畴[J]. 语言科学,2019,18(1): 1−12.
蔡维天. 重温“为什么问怎么样, 怎么样问为什么”——谈汉语疑问句和反身句中的内、外状语 中国语文 2007 318 3 195 207 蔡维天. 重温“为什么问怎么样,怎么样问为什么”−谈汉语疑问句和反身句中的内、外状语[J]. 中国语文,2007,318(3): 195−207.
蔡维天. 谈汉语模态词其分布与诠释的对应关系 中国语文 2010 336 3 208 221 蔡维天. 谈汉语模态词其分布与诠释的对应关系[J]. 中国语文,2010,336(3): 208−221.
蔡维天. 从“这话从何说起?”说起[J]. 语言学论丛,2011,43:184-208.
李湘. 状语“左缘提升”还是小句“右向并入”?——论“怎么”问句质询意图的共时推导与历时变化 中国语文 2019 392 5 548 561 李湘. 状语“左缘提升”还是小句“右向并入”?−论“怎么”问句质询意图的共时推导与历时变化[J]. 中国语文,2019,392(5): 548−561.
李宇明. 语法研究录[M]. 北京:商务印书馆,2002.
刘彬, 袁毓林. “哪里”类反问句否定意义的形成与识解机制 华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版) 2019 58 1 110 117 刘彬,袁毓林. “哪里”类反问句否定意义的形成与识解机制[J]. 华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2019,58(1): 110−117.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2456.2019.01.018
刘月华. 语调是非问句 语言教学与研究 1988 2 25 34 刘月华. 语调是非问句[J]. 语言教学与研究,1988,(2): 25−34.
刘月华等. 实用现代汉语语法[M]. 北京:商务印书馆,2001.
陆志军, 温宾利. “才VP”句与“就VP了”句的语法特性、时间指称以及句法结构分析 当代语言学 2019 21 3 400 417 陆志军,温宾利. “才VP”句与“就VP了”句的语法特性、时间指称以及句法结构分析[J]. 当代语言学,2019,21(3): 400−417.
邵敬敏. 现代汉语疑问句研究[M]. 上海:华东师大出版社,1996.
石定栩, 周蜜, 姚瑶. 评价副词与背景命题——“偏偏”的语义与句法特性 外语教学与研究 2017 49 6 914 926 石定栩,周蜜,姚瑶. 评价副词与背景命题−“偏偏”的语义与句法特性[J]. 外语教学与研究,2017,49(6): 914−926.
史芬茹. 汉语特殊疑问句形式反问句的形式特征调查分析 神奈川大学言語研究 2010 32 19 92 史芬茹. 汉语特殊疑问句形式反问句的形式特征调查分析[J]. 神奈川大学言語研究,2010,(32): 19−92.
徐盛桓. 疑问句探询功能的迁移 中国语文 1999 268 1 3 11 徐盛桓. 疑问句探询功能的迁移[J]. 中国语文,1999,268(1): 3−11.
汪昌松. 韵律句法交互作用下的汉语非疑问用法 韵律研究(第2辑) 2017 1 73 100 汪昌松. 韵律句法交互作用下的汉语非疑问用法[J]. 韵律研究(第2辑),2017,(1): 73−100.
王栋,盛玉麒. 汉语否定极项(NPI)自动抽取研究[C] // 孙茂松,陈群秀. 中国计算机语言学研究前沿进展(2007-2009). 北京:清华大学出版社,2009. 639−644.
杨洋, 蔡维天. 念力移转的韵律语法及实验研究 世界汉语教学 2019 33 1 20 30 杨洋,蔡维天. 念力移转的韵律语法及实验研究[J]. 世界汉语教学,2019,33(1): 20−30.
姚瑶, 石定栩. 背景命题及其触发机制——从“根本”说起 外语教学与研究 2015 47 5 709 720 姚瑶,石定栩. 背景命题及其触发机制−从“根本”说起[J]. 外语教学与研究,2015,47(5): 709−720.
叶建军. 《祖堂集》疑问句研究[M]. 北京:中华书局,2010.
尹世超. 说语气词“哈”和“哈”字句 方言 1999 2 95 103 尹世超. 说语气词“哈”和“哈”字句[J]. 方言,1999,(2): 95−103.
袁毓林. 现代汉语祈使句研究[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,1993.
张伯江. 疑问句功能琐议 中国语文 1997 257 2 104 110 张伯江. 疑问句功能琐议[J]. 中国语文,1997,257(2): 104−110.
朱德熙. 语法·修辞·作文[M]. 上海:上海教育出版社,1984.
[1] Yanfei ZHANG,Shaojie ZHANG. Diachronic Cognitive Pragmatics: Theoretical Framework and Analytical Path [J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2024, 47(2): 31-39.
[2] Lihe HUANG,Quan YAO. Clinical Pragmatics: Interdisciplinary Perspectives and Integrative Approaches [J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2024, 47(2): 19-30.
[3] Qiang LI. The Semantic Combinatorial Mechanism of Non-spatial "Dà(大)+N" Structure [J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2023, 46(4): 27-42.
[4] YUE Ming, CHEN Hong, ZHANG Yi. The Choice of English Singular Epicene Pronoun by Chinese Learners: A Mixed Study [J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2023, 46(4): 43-55.
[5] MA Tinghui. The Neuroscience Approach to Pragmatic Research — Neuropragmatics [J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2023, 46(4): 56-67.
[6] CHEN Wenjun, HU Yanbing, JIANG Xiaoming. Encoding and Decoding Mechanisms for Speakers’ Individual and Group Identities: A Social Psycholinguistics Perspective [J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2023, 46(4): 68-81.
[7] Jia LIU,Lin FAN. An ERP Study on Chinese Emotion-Label and Emotion-Laden Word Processing [J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2023, 46(3): 32-45.
[8] Shiyang SHAO,Ping WU. A Study on the Effects of Subjective and Objective Specificity on Chinese EFL Learners' Output of English Articles [J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2023, 46(3): 21-31.
[9] Hongzhao ZHOU. An Intelligent Recognition Model for Chinese Pseudo-sentiment Sentences Driven by Formal Semantic Knowledge [J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2023, 46(3): 13-20.
[10] ZHANG Chunyan, RAN Yongping. An Interpersonal Metaphor Perspective on the Double Meaning of Conditional-and Clause Complexes [J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2023, 46(3): 46-56.
[11] LI Lin, LI Chenxin, LI Xiaomeng. On the Economic Discourse Research from the Perspective of Appraisal Theory: Text Mining Analysis on Evaluation of China’s Economy in Foreign Academia [J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2023, 46(3): 57-69.
[12] LI Sixu. Formation Mechanisms of Discourse Markers and the Frontier Topics [J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2023, 46(3): 70-81.
[13] LYU Jinmei. New Development and Application of Relevance Theory in Web 3.0 App Ecosystem: A Review of Smartphone Communication [J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2023, 46(3): 112-119.
[14] Guodong YU. A Conversation Analytic Research on the Relationship among Treatment Regime Delivery Practice, Treatment Content, and Sequential Position [J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2023, 46(1): 23-33.
[15] Ke LI. On the Rhetorical Mechanism of Narrative Empathy [J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2022, 45(6): 12-20.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
[1] ZHANG Delu. Grammatical Patterns in Engagement in the Appraisal Theory[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2019, 42(2): 2 -10 .
[2] JIANG Chengyong. Stepping Towards Integration and Accommodation: Methodological Innovations in Cross-Cultural Comparative Research and Foreign Literature Studies[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2019, 42(1): 103 -110 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2019, 42(4): 2 -3,6 .
[4] ZHANG Dong, XU Jiajin. A Multifactorial Study of Dative Alternation in English and Chinese[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2019, 42(2): 24 -33 .
[5] LI Sixu. A Linguistic Typological Study of the Locative Alternation Construction[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2019, 42(1): 2 -24 .
[6] YE Jingting. Co-referential Possessors and Intensifiers in World's Languages: A Typological Perspective[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2019, 42(1): 25 -38 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2019, 42(4): 4 -6 .
[8] ZHANG Ying. Translating Chinese Culture from the Perspective of Actor-Network Theory(ANT): A case study of S.I.Hsiung's Lady Precious Stream[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2019, 42(4): 25 -34 .
[9] LIU Jun. The Ditransitives in Southeast Asia Area: Typology and motivation[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2019, 42(4): 35 -45 .
[10] YONG Qian. Tense, Aspect and Mood in Counterfactual Clauses-Pathways of Marking System: Forming, Analogy and Renovation[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2019, 42(2): 11 -23 .