• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国人文社会科学核心期刊
  • 中文社会科学引文索引（CSSCI）来源期刊
  • 国家社会科学基金学术期刊资助入选期刊
二维码
YU Haopeng, HE Xiaowei. The Syntax and Semantics of Chinese Epistemic and Alethic Modals: A Cartographic Solution[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2019, 42(5): 33-43.
Citation: YU Haopeng, HE Xiaowei. The Syntax and Semantics of Chinese Epistemic and Alethic Modals: A Cartographic Solution[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2019, 42(5): 33-43.
shu

The Syntax and Semantics of Chinese Epistemic and Alethic Modals: A Cartographic Solution

  • 1.

    Faculty of International Studies, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, China

  • 2.

    Faculty of English Language and Culture, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou 510420, China

More Information
  • Received Date: March 21, 2018
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • This paper investigates the relationship between syntax and semantics of Chinese epistemic and alethic modals along the line of Cartographic Approach.There are controversies concerning syntactic properties of modals, such as keneng and yinggai, which denotes possibility and necessity respectively.Our investigation reveals that both of the modals can function as epistemic and alethic modals.The former denotes subjective judgment, while the latter denotes objective description.Following Cinque's Cartographic Approach (1999;2006), the epistemic modal is positioned in the CP layer, while the alethic modal in the TP layer.The syntactic analysis of various modal constructions shows that the initial noun in the epistemic modal construction is a topic, the initial noun in the alethic modal construction is a subject.Our study demonstrates that the Cartographic Approach is effective in accounting for the mapping mechanism between the syntax and semantics of modals.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (31)
  • [1]
    Alrenga, P.A sentential subject asymmetry in English and its implications for complement selection[J].Syntax, 2005, 8:175-207.
    [2]
    Boskovic, Z.On the locality and motivation of Move and Agree:an even more minimal theory[J].Linguistic Inquiry, 2007, 38:589-644.
    [3]
    Brown, K.Double modals in Hawick Scots[C]//Trudgill, P.& J.K.Chambers.Dialects of English:Studies in Grammatical Variation.London:Longman, 1992.
    [4]
    Chomsky, N.Derivation by Phase[C]//Kenstowicz, M.Ken Hale:A Life in Language. Cambridge Mass.:MIT Press, 2001.
    [5]
    Chou, C.-T.T.Unvalued interpretable features and topic A-movement in Chinese raising modal constructions[J].Lingua, 2013, 123:118-147.
    [6]
    Cinque, G.Adverbs and Functional Projections:A Cross-linguistic Perspective[M].New York:Oxford University Press, 1999.
    [7]
    Cinque, G.Restructuring and Functional Heads:The Cartography of Syntactic Structures [M].New York:Oxford University Press, 2006.
    [8]
    Guo, Jiangsheng.Social interaction, meaning and grammatical form:Children's development and use of modal auxiliaries in Mandarin Chinese.[D].Berkley:University of California at Berkley, 1994.
    [9]
    Ko, H.Syntax of why-in-situ:merge into[Spec, CP] in the overt syntax[J].Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 2005, 23:867-916.
    [10]
    Kim, K.S.Movement paradoxes are not paradoxes:A raising approach[J].Lingua, 2011, 121:1009-1041.
    [11]
    Landau, I.EPP extensions[J].Linguistic Inquiry, 2007, 38:485-523.
    [12]
    Lin, J.& J.Tang.Modals as verbs in Chinese:A GB perspective[J].The Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, 1995, 66(1):53-105.
    [13]
    Lin,T.H.J.Finiteness of clauses and raising of arguments in Mandarin Chinese[J].Syntax, 2011, 14:48-73.
    [14]
    Lyons, J.Semantics (vols I & II)[M].Cambridge:CUP, 1977.
    [15]
    Miyagawa, S.Why Agree? Why Move? Unifying Agreement-Based and Discourse-Configurational Languages[M].Cambridge, Mass.:MIT Press, 2010.
    [16]
    Rizzi, L.The fine structure of the left periphery[C]//Haegeman, L.Elements of Grammar.Dordrecht:Klwuer, 1997.
    [17]
    Rizzi, L.The cartography of syntactic structures:criteria freezing and interface effects[Z]//A Talk Given at Glow VIII in Asia, Beijing, 2010.
    [18]
    Traugott, E.C.& R.B.Dasher.Regularity in Semantic Change[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2005.
    [19]
    Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan, Yang, Ching-Yu H.& Seng-hian Lau.Modal licensing and subject specificity in Mandarin and Taiwan southern Min:a cartographic analysis[C]//Si, Fuzhen.Studies in Cartographic Syntax.Beijing:China Social Sciences Press, 2017.
    [20]
    Verstraete, J.C.Subjective and objective modality:Interpersonal and ideational functions in the English modal auxiliary system[J].Journal of Pragmatics, 2001, 33(10):1505-1528.
    [21]
    Vikner, S.Modals in Danish and event expressions[J].Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax, no.39.Department of Scandinavian Languages, University of Lund, 1988.
    [22]
    蔡维天.谈汉语模态词的分布与诠释之对应关系[J].中国语文, 2010,(3):208-221.
    [23]
    曹逢甫.汉语的提升动词[J].中国语文, 1996,(3):172-182.
    [24]
    胡波.汉语情态助动词的提升和移位[J].当代语言学, 2015, 17(2):159-171.
    [25]
    刘晓林, 王文斌, 谭仁山, 陈文碧.历史语言学视野下的英汉语序对比研究[M].上海:上海外语教育出版, 2015.
    [26]
    吕叔湘.现代汉语八百词(增订本)[M].北京:商务印书馆, 2006[1999].
    [27]
    彭利贞.现代汉语情态研究[D].上海:复旦大学博士论文, 2005.
    [28]
    彭家法."句法结构制图工程"研究进展及相关讨论[J].外国语, 2013, 36(4):47-52.
    [29]
    杨彩梅.生成语法框架下关系结构的句法与一语习得研究[M].北京:商务印书馆, 2013.
    [30]
    张志恒.从制图理论探索汉语话题与焦点的分布[J].现代外语,2013, 36(1):10-17.
    [31]
    朱冠明.情态与汉语情态动词[J].山东外语教学, 2005, (2):17-21.
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]MA Baopeng, ZHUANG Huibin. The Review of Prosody-Syntax Interface Research in the Past Two Decades[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2022, 45(1): 56-66.
    [2]WANG Yingying, XING Liya. On the Three Uses of the Chinese Adverb “Yiding” and Its Intensification on Strong Necessity Modals[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2019, 42(3): 72-82.
    [3]LIU Mingming, CUI Yanyan. Situating Mandarin Wh-indefinites in the Typology of Modal Indefinites[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2019, 42(3): 26-37.
    [4]YANG Ling. A Corpus-Based Study of Semantic-Syntactic Inferfaces of Chinese and English Change-of-State Verbs[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2017, 40(3): 52-60.
    [5]NIU Baoyi. A Study of the Grounding Function of Modal Verb May in English[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2017, 40(3): 12-22.
    [6]WANG Deliang. Dialogic Syntax: The Latest Exploration of Conversation Analysis from Cognitive Functionalism[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2017, 40(2): 51-61.
    [7]SUN Shufang. Illocutionary Force and Modal Sense[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2012, 35(5): 54-58.
    [8]WANG Yuan. Revisiting the Semantics of Progressive[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2011, 34(3): 31-39.
    [9]HAN Weifeng, MEI Deming. Syntax-Semantics Mismatched Structure and the Topical Analysis[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2011, 34(3): 21-30.
    [10]DAI Manchun. The Issue of Case in Minimalist Syntax[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2011, 34(2): 2-13.

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(9)

    1. 左慧芳. 基于扩展意义单位模型的老年人媒介形象分析. 长沙大学学报. 2024(03): 15-23 .
    2. 甄凤超. 复合词项语义韵研究再探. 外语教学与研究. 2023(01): 41-52+159 .
    3. 苏杭，叶军，张钰卿. 局部语法框架下中美媒体新冠疫情话语表征分析. 外语与外语教学. 2023(01): 12-23+144 .
    4. 刘传江，谢芳. 学术英语词表验证的共选路径——以“common”为例. 中国ESP研究. 2023(01): 55-66+129 .
    5. 刘运锋. 扩展意义单位再审视. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报). 2023(04): 17-26 .
    6. 范晨曦，杨洪娟. 基于语料库的“命运”一词的英译研究. 英语广场. 2023(22): 50-54 .
    7. 邓素兰. 语料库驱动下的英语动词配价结构研究. 萍乡学院学报. 2023(04): 77-81 .
    8. 胡文飞，刘亚兰. 语义韵视域下汉英词典文化词的记忆研究. 外语教学理论与实践. 2023(06): 31-41 .
    9. 张瑞华，刘泽蕊. 中西媒体关于“数字经济”的话语建构对比研究. 外国语言与文化. 2022(03): 133-145 .

    Other cited types(1)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (1351) PDF downloads (25) Cited by(10)
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References
    Related Articles
    Email Alert RSS

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  Baidu Analytics

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return