有关汉语名词与动词的一些理论问题兼论“名动包含”理论

Some Theoretical Issues on Chinese Nouns and Verbs:A Critical Analysis of the Noun-Verb Inclusion Theory

  • 摘要: 摘要:本文讨论沈家煊(2009)以来提出的“名动包含”理论,尝试揭示这一理论所依据的逻辑与事实基础,并评估其理论价值及在语言教学中的应用。文章分析了沈(2016)提出的6条名词与动词的分布规则与“名动包含”理论的一致性问题。此外,文章还讨论了沈(2023a)提及的“乞得命题”问题,以及Larson(1992)有关supernominal(大名词)的表述与沈先生引述之间的一致性问题。希望此类讨论有助于推进汉语词类理论系统的建设。

     

    Abstract: This paper evaluates the Noun-Verb Inclusion theory advanced by Shen Jiaxuan (2009), seeking to elucidate its logical and empirical foundations, and assesses its theoretical significance and potential for pedagogical application. It analyzes the six distributional patterns for nouns and verbs proposed in Shen (2016) and their consistency with the theory. Further, it revisits the issue of begging the question raised in Shen (2023a) and evaluate the consistency between his citations and Larson’s (1992) analysis of super nominals. The discussion may shed new light on the theoretical framework of Chinese word classes.

     

/

返回文章
返回