Journal of Foreign Languages ›› 2021, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1): 41-63.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Mapuche People:Valuing a Colonial Past in the Official Primary History Textbook from an Intermodal Perspective of Historical Sources

Teresa Oteíza   

  1. Pontifical Catholic University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
  • Received:2020-04-21 Online:2021-01-20 Published:2021-02-03

Abstract: This article explores from an intermodal perspective how visual and verbal historical documents contribute to the construction of value positions regarding the Mapuche people during colonial and early republican times in the latest official 5th grade primary Chilean History textbook.The study analyzes, in particular, the visual and verbal historical secondary sources that build in combination evaluative prosodies that in turn contribute to construct determinate ideological perspectives regarding Mapuche people.The discourse analysis takes a social and ideological intermodal approach (Oteíza & Pinuer 2016, 2019) focusing on an appraisal analysis (Martin & White 2005; Martin 2014; Hood 2010; Oteíza & Pinuer 2012, 2019) informed by socio-semiotic and Systemic Functional Linguistics theories.The cumulative intersemiotic reading of symbolic images and written documents privileges evaluative prosodies of negative integrity and of high conflict, in which Mapuche people are represented with more agency than Hispanics, emphasizing the stereotype of indigenous people as foreign, exotic and brave warriors, but also as violent, primitive and savage people that have had resisted Hispanic desires of slavering and cultural assimilation.Historical secondary sources offer alternative historical interpretations, although mainly constructed by evoked evaluations that could be less evident to children.

Key words: appraisal analysis, intermodal analysis, historical evidence, History textbooks, Mapuche people

CLC Number: 

  • H030
[1] Achugar, M.2017.Critical discourse analysis and history.In The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Analysis.J.Flowerdew & J.Richardson Eds.(Pp.398-211).London/New York:Routledge.
[2] Baterman, J.2014.Text and Image:A critical introduction to the visual/verbal divide.Abigdon, U.K.:Tylor and Francis.
[3] Bello, A.& M.Rangel.2002.La equidad y la exclusión de los pueblos indígenas y afrodescendientes en América Latina y el Caribe.Revista de la Cepal 76:39-54.
[4] Boccara, G.& I.Seguel.1999.Políticas Indígenas en Chile (siglos XIX y XX).De la asimilación al pluralismo (El Caso Mapuche).Revista de Indias, vol.LIX, (207):741-774.
[5] Boccara, G.& P.Bolados.2010.Qué es el multiculturalismo? La Nueva Cuestión Étnica en el Chile Neoliberal.Revista de Indias, vol.LXX (250):651-690.
[6] Boccara, G.(Ed.) 2002.Colonización, Resistencia y Mestizaje en las Américas (siglos XVI-XX).Quito:Ediciones Abya-Yala.
[7] Burke, P.2005.El uso de la imagen como documento histórico.Barcelona:Crítica.
[8] Coffin, C.2006.Historical Discourse:The Language of Time, Cause and Evaluation.London:Continuum.
[9] Fernández Leiva, C.& G.Giadrosic Reyes.2018.Historia, Geografía y Ciencias Sociales.Texto del estudiante.Ministry of Education of Chile.Government of Chile.Santiago:SM Editores.
[10] Jelin, E.2002.Los trabajos de la memoria.Madrid:Siglo Veintiuno Editores S.A.
[11] Jewitt, C., J.Bezerman & K.O'Halloran.2016.Introducing Multimodality.London:Routledge.
[12] Halliday, M.A.K.1978.Language as a Social Semiotic:The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning.London:Edward Arnold.
[13] Halliday, M.A.K.& C.Matthiessen.2014.An Introduction to Functional Grammar.London:Edward Arnold.
[14] Hernaández, P.2012.Imagen-palabra.Lugar, sujecioón y Mirada en las artes visuals Centroamericanas.Fraáncfort:Vervuert.
[15] Hood, S.2010.Appraising Research:Evaluation in Academic Writing.London:Palgrave Macmillan.
[16] Hood, S.2019.Appraisal.In The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics, G.Thompson, W.Bowcher, L.Fontaine & D.Schonthal Eds.(Pp.382-409).Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
[17] Kress, G.2003.Literacy in the New Media Age.London, New York:Routledge.
[18] Kress, G.2009.Multimodality.A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication.London/New York:Routledge.
[19] Kress, G.& T.Van Leeuwen.2006.Reading Images.The Grammar of Visual Design.London:Routledge.
[20] Kress, G.& T.van Leeuwen.2001.Multimodal Discourse:the modes and media of contemporary communication, New York:Oxford University Press.
[21] Lira, E.2013.Algunas reflexiones a Propósito de los 40 años del Golpe Militar en Chile y las Condiciones de la Reconciliación Política.Psykhe, 22(2), 5-18.doi:10.7764/psykhe.22.2.676
[22] Loveman, B.2001.Chile.The Legacy of Hispanic Capitalism.New York:Oxford University Press.
[23] Mallon, F.2004.La sangre del copihue.La comunidad Mapuche de Nicolás Ailío y el Estado chileno, 1906-2001.Santiango:LOM Editores.
[24] Manghi, D.& C.Badilla.2015.Modos Semióticos en el Discurso Pedagógico de Historia:Potencial Semiótico Para la Mediación en el Aula Escolar.Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura 20(2):157-172.
[25] Martin, J.R.& P.White.2005.The Language of Evaluation.Appraisal in English.New York:Palgrave Macmillan.
[26] Martin, J.R.2019.Discourse semantics.In The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics, G.Thompson, W.Bowcher, L.Fontaine & D.Sch nthal Eds.(Pp.358-381).Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
[27] Martin, J.R.2014.Evolving systemic functional linguistics:beyond the clause, Functional Linguistics, 1(3):1-24.
[28] Martin J.R.2004.Sense and sensibility:Texturing evaluation.In J.A.Foley (ed.) Language, Education and Discourse:Functional Approaches (Pp.142-175).London:Continuum.
[29] Martin, J.R.& D.Rose.2007.Working with Discourse.London:Continuum.Second edition.
[30] Martin, J.R.& P.White.2005.The Language of Evaluation:Appraisal in English.New York:Palgrave Macmillan.
[31] Maturana, C.L.2018.Los ensambles multimodales y los desafíos de la lectura y escritura multimodal en la formación de profesores de enseñanza básica.In Qué leer? Cómo leer? Lectura e Inclusión, MINEDUC, Universidad Católica, 329-336.
[32] Mills, K.& L.Unsworth.2018.Multilingual Literacy.Oxford Research Encyclopedia, Education.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
[33] Oteíza, T.2019.Historical events and processes in the discourse of disciplinary History and classroom interaction.In J.R.Martin, K.Maton and J.Doran (Eds.).Academic Discourse:Systemic Functional Linguistics and Legitimation Code Theory.(Pp.177-207).London/New York:Routledge.
[34] Oteíza, T.2018.Prácticas de la memoria en clases de historia:construcción de la evidencia multimodal e intertextual del pasado reciente chileno.Discurso & Sociedad, 12(1), 112-160.
[35] Oteíza, T.2017a.The Appraisal Framework and discourse analysis.In T.Bartlett & G.O'Grady (Eds.).The Routledge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics.(Pp.457-472).London/New York:Routledge.
[36] Oteíza, T.2017b.Educación pública en Chile y practicas de la memoria:análisis social-ideológico del discurso e interacción en clases de historia.Cadernos de Linguagem e Sociedade (3):144-174.
[37] Oteíza, T.& M.Achugar.2018.History Textbooks and the construction of dictatorship.Palgrave Handbook of Textbook Studies, Eckhardt Fuchs and Annekatrin Bock (Eds.).(Pp.305-318).New York:Palgrave.
[38] Oteíza, T.& C.Castro.2019.Dictatorship and the Cold War in official Chilean History Textbooks.In B.Christophe, P.Gautschi and R.Thorp (Eds.).Teaching the Cold War:International Perspectives on Memory Practices in Educational Media and in the Classroom.(Pp.219-245).New York:Palgrave.
[39] Oteíza, T.& C.Pinuer.2019.El sistema de VALORACIÓN como herramienta teórico-metodológica para el estudio social e ideológico del discurso.Logos 29(2):207-228.
[40] Oteíza, T.& C.Pinuer.2016.Appraisal framework and critical discourse studies:a joint approach to the study of historical memories from an intermodal perspective.International Journal of Language Studies, 10(2):5-32.
[41] Oteíza, T.& C.Pinuer.2012.Prosodia valorativa:construcción de eventos y procesos en el discurso de la historia.Discurso & Sociedad 6(2):418-446.
[42] Painter, C., J.R.Martin & L.Unsworth.2013.Reading Visual Narratives.Image Analysis of Children's Picture Books.Lancaster/Bristol:Equinox.
[43] Ravelli, L.2018.Multimodality and the register of disciplinary History:Challenges for new texts and old theories.Language, Context and Text, 1(2):341-365.
[44] Unsworth, L.2019.Multimodal literacy and large-scale literacy tests:Curriculum relevance and responsibility.Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 42(2):128-139.
[45] Wertsch, J.2002.Voices of Collective Remembering.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
[46] Winn, P., S.Stern, F.Lorenz & A.Marchesi.2014.No hay mañana sin ayer.Batallas por la memoria histórica en el Cono Sur.Santiago:LOM ediciones.
[1] Peter R. R. White. Textual Anticipation and the Putative Reader in Persuasive Discourse [J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2021, 44(1): 2-20.
[2] Michele Zappavigna. Ambient Affiliation in Comments on YouTube Videos:Communing Around Values About ASMR [J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2021, 44(1): 21-40.
[3] ZHOU Shihong. Right Periphery Particle Hao (嚎) in Northeastern Mandarin:Layered Structure and Its Epistemic Stance in Talk-in-Interaction [J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2020, 43(5): 74-86.
[4] WANG Jun. Temporality in Chinese: A Semantic Co-relation Perspective [J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2020, 43(4): 44-52.
[5] WANG Xiaojing, CHEN Xinren. From Margin to Center: A Review of the Special Theme in the 16th International Pragmatics Conference [J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2020, 43(4): 124-128.
[6] RAN Yongping, HUANG Xu. Politeness and Relationship from the Perspective of Interpersonal Pragmatics [J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2020, 43(3): 35-45.
[7] LI Citing, REN Wei. The Complex Dynamic Systems Theory and Second Language Pragmatic Development Research [J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2020, 43(3): 46-54.
[8] WU Jianguo, GONG Chun, SONG Yue. Investigating Political Discourse from the Perspective of CMA: A Case Study on Trump's Speeches [J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2020, 43(3): 80-88.
[9] LI Wenzhong. Local Semantic Prosodies and Their Discourse Management [J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2019, 42(4): 81-91.
[10] SHANG Xiaoming, CHENG Lulu. Current Hot Issues of Pragmatic Impairment from the Perspective of Developmental Pragmatics [J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2019, 42(4): 103-112.
[11] Louise McNally. Scalar Alternatives and Scalar Inference Involving Adjectives: A Comment on van Tiel, et al.(2016) [J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2019, 42(3): 2-12.
[12] YU Yue, WU Yicheng. Where Semantics Meets Pragmatics: The Incremental Interpretation of Conversational Dialogues [J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2019, 42(3): 13-25.
[13] LIU Mingming, CUI Yanyan. Situating Mandarin Wh-indefinites in the Typology of Modal Indefinites [J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2019, 42(3): 26-37.
[14] XIE Zhiguo. The Progressive Aspect as a Polarity Item (Non-)Licenser: A Crosslinguistic Study [J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2019, 42(3): 38-46.
[15] LUO Qiongpeng. Semantics and Morphosyntactic Variation: The Case of Scalar Equatives in English and Mandarin [J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2019, 42(3): 47-59.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
[1] ZHANG Delu. Grammatical Patterns in Engagement in the Appraisal Theory[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2019, 42(2): 2 -10 .
[2] JIANG Chengyong. Stepping Towards Integration and Accommodation: Methodological Innovations in Cross-Cultural Comparative Research and Foreign Literature Studies[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2019, 42(1): 103 -110 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2019, 42(4): 2 -3,6 .
[4] ZHANG Dong, XU Jiajin. A Multifactorial Study of Dative Alternation in English and Chinese[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2019, 42(2): 24 -33 .
[5] LI Sixu. A Linguistic Typological Study of the Locative Alternation Construction[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2019, 42(1): 2 -24 .
[6] YE Jingting. Co-referential Possessors and Intensifiers in World's Languages: A Typological Perspective[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2019, 42(1): 25 -38 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2019, 42(4): 4 -6 .
[8] ZHANG Ying. Translating Chinese Culture from the Perspective of Actor-Network Theory(ANT): A case study of S.I.Hsiung's Lady Precious Stream[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2019, 42(4): 25 -34 .
[9] LIU Jun. The Ditransitives in Southeast Asia Area: Typology and motivation[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2019, 42(4): 35 -45 .
[10] YONG Qian. Tense, Aspect and Mood in Counterfactual Clauses-Pathways of Marking System: Forming, Analogy and Renovation[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2019, 42(2): 11 -23 .