外国语

外国语 ›› 2023, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3): 46-56.

• 语言研究 • 上一篇    

人际隐喻视角下and条件复句的语义双重性研究

张春燕1,2, 冉永平1   

  1. 1. 广东外语外贸大学 外国语言学及应用语言学研究中心, 广东 广州 510420;
    2. 广东财经大学 外国语学院, 广东 广州 510320
  • 收稿日期:2022-09-15 发布日期:2023-05-27
  • 作者简介:张春燕,副教授,博士,在站博士后。研究方向:功能语言学；冉永平,教授,博士生导师。研究方向:语用学。
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究项目(21YJA740048);中国博士后科学基金项目(2020M672560);广东省社科规划项目(GD20CWY05);广东省教育厅科研项目(2020WTSCX027)

An Interpersonal Metaphor Perspective on the Double Meaning of Conditional-and Clause Complexes

ZHANG Chunyan1,2, RAN Yongping1   

  1. 1. Center for Linguistics and Applied Linguistics, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou 510420, China;
    2. School of Foreign Languages, Guangdong University of Finance and Economics, Guangzhou 510320, China
  • Received:2022-09-15 Published:2023-05-27

摘要： 经典的并列连词and可联结小句构成条件复句,表达条件语义的同时,亦可表达祈使语义。本文主要基于系统功能语言学理论,尝试从人际隐喻视角出发,探讨and条件复句的语义双重性及其语言机制。研究发现,通过语气隐喻、评价隐喻等人际语法资源,and条件复句体现了条件-结果逻辑语义和人际命令或评价语义的融合,其功能可强化或柔化说话人的指令语力,或间接地体现说话人对相关事物或事件的态度、立场及其它评价,从而拓展了语言系统的意义潜势。

关键词: 人际隐喻, and条件复句, 语义双重性

Abstract: As a conventional coordinating conjunction, and is capable of combining clauses to create conditional clause complexes that convey both a conditional and an imperative meaning.Drawing on the theoretical framework of systemic functional linguistics, this paper endeavors to investigate the double meaning of conditional-and clause complexes and the language mechanism from an interpersonal metaphor perspective.The study finds that by leveraging mood and appraisal metaphors, conditional-and clause complexes allow for the blending of the conditional-result logical meaning with the interpersonal meaning of a command or an appraisal.In doing so, speakers can modulate (i.e., enhance or soften) their directive force, or indirectly convey attitudes, stances and other interpersonal evaluations of specified things or events, thus expanding the meaning potential of the language system.

Key words: interpersonal metaphor, conditional-and clause complexes, double meaning

中图分类号: 

  • H030
[1] Bednarek, M.Polyphony in Appraisal:Typological and topological perspective[J].Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 2010, 3(2):107-136.
[2] Bolinger, D.The imperative in English[C]//Halle, M., Lunt, H.& H.McLean.To Honor Roman Jakobson:Essays on the occasion of his seventieth birthday, vol 1.Mouton:The Hague, 1967.335-362.
[3] Clark, B.Relevance and "Pseudo-Imperatives"[J].Linguistics and Philosophy, 1993,16(1):79-121.
[4] Culicover, P.OM sentences[J].Foundations of Language, 1972, (8):199-236.
[5] Davies, E.The English Imperative[M].London:Routledge.1986.
[6] Franke, M.Pseudo-imperatives[D].Amsterdam:University of Amsterdam.2005.
[7] Halliday, M.A.K.On grammar and grammatics[C]//Webster, J.On Grammar, vol.1 in The Collected Works of M.A.K.Halliday.London:Continuum/Beijing:Peking University Press, 1996/2007.384-417.
[8] Halliday, M.A.K.& R.Hasan.Language, Context and Text:Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective[M].Geelong, Vic.:Deakin University Press, 1985
[9] Halliday, M.A.K.& C.M.I.M.Matthiessen.Halliday's Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th edition)[M].Oxon:Routledge, 2014
[10] Han, Chung-hye.The Structure and Interpretation of Imperatives:Mood and Force in Universal Grammar[M].London:Routledge, 2000.
[11] He, Qingshun.A corpus-based study of interpersonal metaphors of modality in English[J].Studia Neophilologica, 2021, 93(1):50-71.
[12] Jary, M.& M.Kissine.Imperatives[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2014.
[13] Jespersen, O.A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles.vol.5:Syntax[M].London:George Allen & Unwin Ltd., 1909.
[14] Keshet, E.& J.D.Medeiros.Imperatives under coordination[J].Nat Lang Linguist Theory, 2019, (37):869-914.
[15] Lemke, J.Resources for attitudinal meaning:Evaluative orientations in text semantics[J].Functions of Language, 1998, 5(1):33-56.
[16] Martin, J.R.Metaphors we feel by:stratal tension[J].Journal of World Languages, 2020, (6):8-26.
[17] Martin, J.R.& D.Rose.Working with Discourse:Meaning beyond the Clause[M].London:Bloomsbury Publishing PLC, 2007.
[18] Martin, J.R.& P.R.R.White.The Language of Evaluation:Appraisal in English[M].New York:Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
[19] Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G.& J.Svartvik.A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language[M].London:Longman, 1985.
[20] Russell, B.Imperatives in conditional conjunctions[J].Natural Language Semantics, 2007, (15):131-166.
[21] Scontras, G.& E.Gibson.A quantitative investigation of the imperative-and-declarative construction in English[J].Language, 2011, 87(4):817-829.
[22] Taverniers, M.Interpersonal grammatical metaphor as double scoping and double grounding[J].Word, 2008, (59):83-109.
[23] Wierzbicka, A.Conditionals and counterfactuals:Conceptual primitives and linguistic universals[C]//Athanasiadou A.& R.Dirven.On Conditionals Again.Amsterdam and Philadelphia:John Benjamins Publishing, 1997.15-60.
[24] Yang, Bingjun.Interpersonal metaphor revisited:categorization, identification and syndrome[J].Social Semiotics, 2019, 29(2):186-203.
[25] 常晨光.英语中的人际语法隐喻[J].外语与外语教学, 2001, (7):6-8.
[26] 封宗信.系统功能语言学的"语法逻辑"[J].当代外语研究, 2013, (4):5-11.
[27] 黄国文,王红阳.《功能语言学入门》(第二版)导读(原著Thompson G.)[M].北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2008.vii-xxxi.
[28] 彭宣维.视角逆行、评价隐喻与情感伦理诉求——《你还在我身旁》的评价文体效应与解读模型[J].外语学刊, 2016, (1):41-48.
[29] 王品.系统功能类型学视阈下的语法描写范式——以语气系统为例[J].外国语(上海外国语大学学报),2022, (05):53-64.
[30] 邢福义.汉语复句研究[M].北京:商务印书馆, 2001.
[31] 杨延宁.汉语语法隐喻研究[M].北京:北京大学出版社, 2020.
[32] 张大群.学术论文的评价隐喻研究:类型与功能[J].山东外语教学, 2020, (3):50-60.
[33] 张克定.祈使性条件构式的言者意图及其动因[J].外语教学与研究, 2016, 48(05):669-679.
[34] 赵民.英语社论语篇中的评价隐喻研究[J].外语与外语教学, 2014, (5):17-23.
[1] 于国栋. 诊疗方案给出方式、诊疗内容与序列位置之关系的会话分析研究[J]. 外国语, 2023, 46(1): 23-33.
[2] 李克. 叙事共情的修辞机制[J]. 外国语, 2022, 45(6): 12-20.
[3] 胡范铸,张虹倩,胡亦名. 共同体构建视域下“共情修辞”的目标、问题、路径——兼论“元主体”“他者意识”“话语权补偿”概念[J]. 外国语, 2022, 45(6): 2-11.
[4] 吴亚欣. 汉语语气词的会话分析研究路径[J]. 外国语, 2022, 45(6): 21-33.
[5] 黄萍, 焦健. 老年维权话语研究的内涵、议题和路径[J]. 外国语, 2022, 45(6): 57-65.
[6] 张鑫. 晚清上海会审公廨中的口译活动与华洋角力[J]. 外国语, 2022, 45(6): 118-125.
[7] 任育新. 身份的联合共构：身份动态建构新探[J]. 外国语, 2022, 45(3): 48-58.
[8] 于国栋. 作为汉语言语交际话题过渡讯号的“唉”[J]. 外国语, 2022, 45(2): 61-71,92.
[9] 周凌, 张绍杰. 反问句否定含义强度及(不)礼貌等级的实验语用学研究[J]. 外国语, 2022, 45(1): 25-35.
[10] 张媛. 试论英汉否定思维与时空性思维的关系——来自英汉否定词“not/no”和“不/没”的证据[J]. 外国语, 2021, 44(6): 24-32.
[11] 施旭,梅朝阳. 国防政策与全球传播: 文化话语视野下的中国国家军事战略研究[J]. 外国语, 2021, 44(5): 72-83.
[12] 刘彬,袁毓林. 从概念极性与信息结构看“怀疑”的义项分布及意义识解[J]. 外国语, 2021, 44(5): 13-21.
[13] 黄梦迪. 由原型句式、原型语气结构及其中性语境句研究“吗”的功能[J]. 外国语, 2021, 44(5): 33-41.
[14] 张传睿, 徐慈华, 黄略. 隐喻在论辩中的框架效应[J]. 外国语, 2021, 44(5): 62-71.
[15] 徐盛桓, 廖巧云. 非字面义表达因果蕴含说[J]. 外国语, 2021, 44(5): 2-12.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!