外国语

外国语 ›› 2023, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3): 57-69.

• 语言研究 • 上一篇    

评价系统视域下的经济话语研究——基于国外学界对中国经济评价的文本挖掘分析

李琳1, 李称鑫2, 李小萌3   

  1. 1. 对外经济贸易大学 英语学院, 北京 100029;
    2. 浙江大学 外国语学院, 浙江 杭州 310058;
    3. 对外经济贸易大学 国际学院, 北京 100029
  • 收稿日期:2022-09-14 发布日期:2023-05-27
  • 作者简介:李琳,博士,教授。研究方向:商务话语研究、经济话语；李称鑫,博士生。研究方向:经济话语、二语口语习得；李小萌,博士,副教授。研究方向:世界经济。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金项目"中国对外经济话语能力提升策略研究"(21BYY087)

On the Economic Discourse Research from the Perspective of Appraisal Theory: Text Mining Analysis on Evaluation of China’s Economy in Foreign Academia

LI Lin1, LI Chenxin2, LI Xiaomeng3   

  1. 1. School of International Studies, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China;
    2. School of International Studies, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China;
    3. School of International Education, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China
  • Received:2022-09-14 Published:2023-05-27

摘要： 探究国外学界对中国经济的整体认知和态度,为我们廓清国际舆论提供理据,为建构中国对外经济话语体系,提升中国对外经济话语传播能力提供参考。本研究以评价系统为基础,提出新的三维评价分析框架,采用主题建模和文本挖掘方法考察国外学界对中国经济的评价。研究发现:1)国外学界主要关注"'一带一路’倡议""中国金融改革""中国经济改革""中国的全球经济角色"和"中美经济关系"五个经济领域;2)国外学界对各个领域的评价存在显著差异,对"中国经济改革""中国的全球经济角色"和"'一带一路’倡议"持偏积极态度,对"中国金融改革"和"中美经济关系"持偏消极态度;3)国外学界评价各个经济领域所使用的态度词汇存在显著差异。

关键词: 中国经济, 评价, 文本挖掘, 国外学界

Abstract: This study aims to investigate the overall awareness and attitude of foreign academia towards China’s economy, providing a rationale and reference for clarifying international public opinion, constructing China’s foreign economic discourse system, and improving China’s ability to promote its foreign economic discourse.Based on the Appraisal Theory, a new three-dimensional evaluation analysis framework was proposed, and topic modeling and text mining methods were adopted to investigate the evaluation of China’s economy in foreign academia.The study yielded the following findings: (1) Foreign academia mainly focuses on five economic fields: the Belt and Road Initiative, China’s financial reform, China’s economic reform, China’s role in global economy, and Sino-US economic relations.(2) There are significant differences in the evaluation of these five economic fields by foreign academia.A more positive attitudes were found towards China’s economic reform, China’s role in global economy, and the Belt and Road Initiative, while a little bit negative attitudes were found towards China’s financial reform and Sino-US economic relations.(3) Significant differences were found in the attitude lexica resources used by foreign academia to evaluate these five economic fields.

Key words: China’s economy, evaluation, text mining, foreign academia

中图分类号: 

  • H030
[1] Anand, A.Basu, S.Pathak, J.& A.Thampy.Whose speeches impact European markets:ECB's or the national central banks'?[J].European Financial Management, 2021, (1):1-64.
[2] Beangstrom, T., & R.Adendorff.An appraisal analysis of the language of real estate advertisements[J].Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 2013, 31(3):325-347.
[3] Delaere, I., Sutter, G.De.& K.Plevoets.Is translated language more standardized than non-translated language?[J].Target, 2012, 24(2):203-224.
[4] Fuoli, M.Building a trustworthy corporate identity:A corpus-based analysis of stance in annual and corporate social responsibility reports[J].Applied Linguistics, 2018, 39(6):846-885.
[5] Fuoli, M., & C.Hommerberg.Optimising transparency, reliability and replicability:Annotation principles and inter-coder agreement in the quantification of evaluative expressions[J].Corpora, 2015, 10(3):315-349.
[6] Inwood, O.& M.Zappavigna.Ideology, attitudinal positioning, and the blockchain:a social semiotic approach to understanding the values construed in the whitepapers of blockchain start-ups[J].Social Semiotics, 2021, DOI:10.1080/10350330.2021.1877995.
[7] Labrador, B., N.Ramón, H.Alaiz-Moretón, & H.Sanjurjo-González.Rhetorical structure and persuasive language in the subgenre of online advertisements[J].English for Specific Purposes, 2014, 34(5):38-47.
[8] Llopis, M.A.O.Emotion to forecast a recession:A bilingual lexical and sentiment analysis of the UN and IMF world economy reports for 2019[J].Ibérica, 2020, 40(1):217-244.
[9] Martin, J., & P.White.The Language of Evaluation[M].Basingstoke:Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
[10] Septianto, F., Pontes, N.& F.Tjiptono.The persuasiveness of metaphor in advertising[J].Psychology & Marketing, 2021, 39(5):951-961.
[11] Svyrydenko, D.& O.Stovpets.Cultural and economic strategies of modern China:In search of the cooperation models across the global world[J].Future Human Image, 2020, (13):102-112.
[12] Valeiras-Jurado, J.Multimodal persuasive strategies in product pitches[J].Text & Talk, 2021, 41(4):561-584.
[13] Wang, J.Y."Lifeworld" representation of political measures in president Xi Jinping's discourse[J].Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 2018, 54(3):407-429.
[14] 车思琪,李学沛.评价系统视阈下中美企业致股东信情感话语对比分析——基于情感词典和机器学习的文本挖掘技术[J].外国语,2021,44(2):50-59.
[15] 陈琳琳.中国形象研究的话语转向[J].外语学刊,2018,(3):33-37.
[16] 陈曦蓉.评价理论态度视域下语篇英译策略-以上市公司年报致辞为例[J].上海翻译,2019,(6):41-45.
[17] 冯彦,潘国际.评价理论视域下商业广告语篇中的态度资源研究[J].社会科学战线,2012,(11):270-271.
[18] 付松聚.经济放缓视角下外媒对中国经济形象的构建[J].青年记者,2016,(15):31-32.
[19] 郭亚东.新时代我国对外财经话语能力提升战略研究[J].语言文字应用,2019,(4):54-62.
[20] 胡壮麟,语篇的评价研究[J].外语教学,2009,(1):1-6.
[21] 蒋婷,张慧.生态位视阈下中美广告话语的态度资源对比研究[J].现代外语,2021,(1):37-48.
[22] 李琳.基于语料库的商务话语评价建模研究[J].外语教学与研究,2016,(3):370-381.
[23] 李琳.经济话语研究的进展、价值与展望[J].上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2022,(6):130-138.
[24] 邵珊珊,王立非.基于语言大数据挖掘的电商英汉评价话语情感分析[J].外语电化教学,2019,(5):76-84.
[25] 史兴松,牛一琳.中美企业社会责任话语立场建构对比研究[J].现代外语,2022,(1):40-52.
[26] 王立非,部寒.DICTION文本分析工具及其在情感分析中的应用[J].外国语文,2018,34(1):67-75.
[27] 肖群.商务英语会话中的评价及其功能[J].外语与外语教学,2008,(6):12-14.
[28] 许光,任明,宋城宇.西方媒体新闻中的中国经济形象提取[J].数据分析与知识发现,2021,(5):30-40.
[29] 徐珺,夏蓉.评价理论视域中的英汉商务语篇对比研究[J].外语教学,2013,(3):16-21.
[30] 张鋆.评价的说服机制探析——以商务英语信函为例[J].外语教学,2013,(4):20-26.
[31] 张云玲.商务英语言据性的人际功能研究[J].外语学刊,2016,(1):32-35.
[32] 周冰.趋近化理论视域下的媒体立场研究——基于德国媒体"华为威胁论"相关报道的语料库分析[J].外国语,2021,44(3):71-81.
[1] 车思琪, 李学沛. 评价系统视阈下中美企业致股东信情感话语对比分析——基于情感词典和机器学习的文本挖掘技术[J]. 外国语, 2021, 44(2): 50-59.
[2] 王振华, 瞿桃. 多模态语篇的评价研究:过去、现在与未来[J]. 外国语, 2020, 43(6): 42-51.
[3] 何伟, 马子杰. 生态语言学视角下的评价系统[J]. 外国语, 2020, 43(1): 48-58.
[4] 魏银霞, 杨连瑞. 评价型“V得C”小句嵌入显赫趋向特征的系统功能语法研究[J]. 外国语, 2020, 43(1): 23-33.
[5] 彭宣维. 叙事话语的社会生态效应——基于科幻小说《地狱》的评价解读[J]. 外国语, 2019, 42(4): 92-102.
[6] 张德禄. 评价理论介入系统中的语法模式研究[J]. 外国语, 2019, 42(2): 2-10.
[7] 王恩科. 汉英翻译文学批评的困惑及其哲学思考[J]. 外国语, 2017, 40(2): 73-80.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!