外国语 ›› 2023, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3): 70-81.

• 语言研究 • 上一篇    

话语标记的形成机制与前沿课题

李思旭   

  1. 安徽大学 文学院, 安徽 合肥 230039
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-31 发布日期:2023-05-27
  • 作者简介:李思旭,男,博士,教授,博士生导师。研究方向:语言类型学、认知语言学、词汇化语法化等。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金青年项目"部分量编码方式的类型学研究"(12CYY003);国家社科基金一般项目"固化三音词的词汇化、语法化和构式化研究"(17BYY162)

Formation Mechanisms of Discourse Markers and the Frontier Topics

LI Sixu   

  1. School of Chinese Language and Literature, Anhui University, Hefei 230039, China
  • Received:2022-08-31 Published:2023-05-27

摘要: 国内外学者对话语标记形成机制的分歧,主要集中在语法化、词汇化和语用化上。本文认为,汉语话语标记数量众多,形成机制多样:复音词形式的话语标记是先词汇化再语法化,单音词形式的话语标记是语法化;短语、小句形式的话语标记是语用化。无论是哪种机制形成的话语标记,最终都会涉及语用因素,语用化只在话语标记形成的末端才起作用。接入语语法的"征用"机制,对汉语话语标记的适用度有限,只能解释短语、小句形式话语标记的形成,不能解释词形式话语标记的形成。话语标记是语用标记的一个小类,两者之间要作区分,不能混用。汉语方言和中国境内民族语言话语标记的类型学研究,以及话语标记的二语习得和信息处理研究,是目前国内话语标记研究的前沿课题。

关键词: 话语标记, 语法化, 词汇化, 语用化, 接入语语法

Abstract: Scholars hold different views on the formation mechanisms of discourse markers, which mainly focus on grammaticalization, lexicalization and pragmaticalization.This paper argues that there are numerous Chinese discourse markers with diverse formation mechanisms: discourse markers in the form of polysyllabic words undergo lexicalization before grammaticalization, those in the form of monosyllabic words are formed by grammaticalization, while those in the form of phrases or clauses are formed through pragmaticalization.No matter which mechanism the discourse markers are formed by, pragmatic factors will eventually be involved, and pragmaticalization only takes effect at the very end of the formation of discourse markers.The “cooptation” mechanism behind the thetical grammar has limited applicability to Chinese discourse markers, which can only explain the formation of discourse markers in the form of phrases and clauses, but cannot explain the formation of discourse markers in the form of words.Discourse markers are a subcategory of pragmatic markers.A distinction should be made between these two concepts and they should not be used interchangeably.The typological study of discourse markers in Chinese dialects and national languages within China, as well as the study of second language acquisition and information processing of discourse markers, are currently the frontier topics of discourse markers research in China.

Key words: discourse markers, grammaticalization, lexicalization, pragmaticalization, thetical grammar

中图分类号: 

  • H030
[1] Aijmer, K.I think-an English modal particle[C]//Toril, S.& O.Jansen-Westvik.Modality in Germanic languages:Historical and Comparative Perspectives.Berlin & New York:Mouton de Gruyter, 1997.
[2] Aijmer, K.English Discourse Particles:Evidence from a Corpus[M].Amsterdam:John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2002.
[3] Barth-Weingarten, D.& E.Couper-Kuhlen.On the development of final though:A case of grammaticalization[C]//Wischer, I.& G.Diewald.New Reflections on Grammaticalization.Amsterdam & Philadelphia:John Benjamins, 2002.
[4] Beijering, K.The lexicalization-grammaticalization-pragmaticalization interface[C]//Smith, A.D.M.et al.New Direction in Grammaticalization Research.Amsterdam/Philadelphia:John Benjamins Publishing, 2015.
[5] Blakemore, D.Relevance and Linguistic Meaning:The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2002.
[6] Bücker, J.Pragmaticalization and syntactic change:The diachronic rise of the new quotative "von wegen" in German[D].Sociolinguistics Symposium 17, 2008.
[7] Brinton, L.J.Pragmatic Markers in English:Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions[M].Berlin & New York:Mouton de Gruyter, 1996.
[8] Brinton, L.& E.C.Traugott.Lexicalization and Language Change[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2005.
[9] Diewald, G.Pragmaticalization (defined) as grammaticalization of discourse functions[J].Linguistics, 2011, 49, (2):365-390.
[10] Erman, B.& U.Kotsinas.Pragmaticalization:The Case of ba' and you know, Studies I Modern Sprakvetenskap[M].Stockholm:Almqvist and Wiksell, 1993.
[11] Fraser, B.Pragmatic markers[J].Pragmatics, 1996, 6(2):167-190.
[12] Fraser, B.What are discourse markers[J].Journal of Pragmatics, 1999, 31(7):931-952.
[13] Heine, B.On discourse markers:Grammaticalization, pragmaticalization, or something else[J].Linguistics, 2013, 51(6):1205-1247.
[14] Heine, B., Kaltenböck, G., Kuteva, T.& H.Long.An outline of discourse grammar[C]//Bischoff, S.& C.Jany.Functional Approaches to Language.Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter, 2013.
[15] Heine, B., Kaltenböck, G., Kuteva, T.& H.Long.The Rise of Discourse Markers[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2021.
[16] Heine, B., Kaltenböck, G., Kuteva, T.& H.Long.Cooptation as a discourse strategy[J].Linguistics, 2017, 55(4):813-855.
[17] Hopper, P.J.& E.C.Traugott.Grammaticalization[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2003.
[18] Kaltenböck, G.& B.Heine.On thetical grammar[J].Studies in Language, 2011, 35(4):849-893.
[19] Kaltenböck, G.& B.Heine.Sentence grammar vs.thetical grammar:Two competing domains[C]//Brian, M., Malchukov, A.& E.Moravcsik.Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage.Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2014.
[20] Krug, M.British English is developing a new discourse marker, innit? A study in lexicalisation based on social, regional and stylistic variation[J].Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 1998, (2):145-197.
[21] Marcus, C.The grammaticalization and pragmaticalization of cleft constructions in present-day English[J].Language and Computers, 2012, 17(1):5-21.
[22] Schiffrin, D.Discourse Markers[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1987.
[23] Suzanne, R.& L.Deborah.The Use of like as a Marker of Reported Speech and Thought:A Case of Grammaticalization in Progress[J].American Speech, 1991, 66(3):227-279.
[24] Traugott, E.C.The role of the development of discourse markers:In a theory of grammaticalization[R].Paper presented at the International Conference on Historical Linguistics.Manchester, 1995.
[25] Traugott, E.C.& R.B.Dasher.Regularity in Semantic Change[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2002.
[26] Wischer, I.Grammaticalization vs.Lexicalization:"methinks" there is some confusion[C]//Fischer, O.Pathways of Change:Grammaticalization in English.Amsterdam:Benjamins, 2000.
[27] 安娜.语料库视域下的话语标记研究[M].上海:上海交通大学出版社,2022.
[28] 董秀芳.词汇化与话语标记的形成[J].世界汉语教学,2007,(1):50-61.
[29] 方梅.自然口语中弱化连词的话语标记功能[J].中国语文,2000,(5):459-470.
[30] 方梅.认证义谓宾动词的虚化——从谓宾动词到语用标记[J].中国语文,2005,(6):495-507.
[31] 方梅.浮现语法:基于汉语口语和书面语的研究[M].北京:商务印书馆,2018.
[32] 冯光武.汉语语用标记语的语义、语用分析[J].现代外语,2004,(1):24-31.
[33] 侯瑞芬."别说"与"别提"[J].中国语文,2009,(2):131-140.
[34] 江佳慧.鄂渝川西南官话话语标记研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2021.
[35] 李思旭.从词汇化、语法化看话语标记的形成[J].世界汉语教学,2012,(3):322-337.
[36] 李思旭.话语标记来源模式的多样性[J].汉语学习,2016,(2):18-29.
[37] 李心释,姜永琢.对话语标记的重新认识[J].汉语学习,2008,(6):21-29.
[38] 李宗江.关于话语标记来源研究的两点看法[J].世界汉语教学,2010,(2):192-198.
[39] 刘丽艳.汉语话语标记研究[M].北京:北京语言大学出版社,2011.
[40] 冉永平.话语标记语的语用学研究综述[J].外语研究,2000,(4):8-14.
[41] 冉永平.话语标记语well的语用功能[J].外国语,2003,(3):58-64.
[42] 单谊.自然话语中的话语标记研究:以"你知道"为例[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社,2022.
[43] 施仁娟.基于元话语能力的汉语话语标记研究[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2022.
[44] 孙利萍.现代汉语言说类话语标记研究[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2017.
[45] 吴福祥.汉语语法化研究的当前课题[J].语言科学,2005,(2):20-32.
[46] 徐晶凝.认识立场标记"我觉得"初探[J].世界汉语教学,2012,(2):209-219.
[47] 姚双云.自然口语中的关联标记研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2012.
[48] 姚双云.话语标记的信息处理研究:现状与设想[J].武陵学刊,2015,(1):73-79.
[49] 殷树林.现代汉语话语标记研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2012.
[50] 张金圈,唐雪凝.汉语中的认识立场标记"要我说"及相关格式[J].世界汉语教学, 2013,(2):202-213.
[51] 张黎,袁萍,高一瑄.汉语口语话语标记成分研究[M].北京:北京语言大学出版社,2017.
[52] 周明强.现代汉语话语标记系统与认知研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2022.
[1] 李家春. 致使性状态变化事件言语表征的发展研究[J]. 外国语, 2023, 46(2): 44-56.
[2] 朱丽师. 国内外小句整合研究述评[J]. 外国语, 2021, 44(2): 109-120.
[3] 艾朝阳, 陈荣素. 论汉语“(大)约”的客体化与边界化[J]. 外国语, 2021, 44(1): 76-90.
[4] 杜丹, 吴春相. 存现动词与时体标记的类型特征[J]. 外国语, 2021, 44(1): 64-75.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!