What Should the Lexicon Be Like?-A Biolinguistic Perspective

CHENG Gong

Journal of Foreign Languages > 2018 > 41(1): 23-30.

CHENG Gong. What Should the Lexicon Be Like?-A Biolinguistic Perspective[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2018, 41(1): 23-30.

Citation:

CHENG Gong. What Should the Lexicon Be Like?-A Biolinguistic Perspective[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2018, 41(1): 23-30.

Citation:

CHENG Gong. What Should the Lexicon Be Like?-A Biolinguistic Perspective[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2018, 41(1): 23-30.

PDF (4608 KB)

What Should the Lexicon Be Like?-A Biolinguistic Perspective

CHENG Gong

Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China

More Information

Received Date: November 20, 2016

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

The present paper argues that mainstream theories in contemporary linguistics, including the dominant Minimalist Program, are flawed in their conceptions of the lexicon, especially in view of the perceived fact that language is a recent and emergent system.We provide an alternative anti-lexicalist view, as in Distributed Morphology (DM), on the content and form of the lexicon, such that it should not be generative, but rather should consist of a static list of morphemes accessible to syntactic computation; morphology in the traditional sense should be post-syntactic instead of pre-syntactic.Many stipulated features and categories should be purged from the lexicon, such as categorial features, argument structure, and the inventory of the inflected forms of the lexical verb.
- lexicon,
- biolinguistics,
- Minimalist Program,
- Distributed Morphology

FullText(HTML)

References (56)

References

[1]	Acquaviva, P.Roots and lexicality in distributed morphology[C]//Galani, A., Redinger, D.& N.Yeo.York-Essex Morphology Meeting, 2009, (5).
[2]	Adger, D.A minimalist theory of feature structure[C]//Kibort, A.& G.Corbett.Features.Perspectives on a key notion in linguistics.Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2010.185-218.
[3]	Anderson, S.Amorphous Morphology[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1992.
[4]	Aronoff, M.Morphology by Itself:Stems and Inflectional Classes[M].Cambridge, MA:MIT Press, 1992.
[5]	Beard, R.Lexeme-morpheme Based Morphology:A General Theory of Inflection and Word Formation[M].State University of New York Press, Albany, 1995.
[6]	Berwick, R.& N.Chomsky.Why Only Us:Language and Evolution[M].Cambridge, MA:MIT Press, 2016.
[7]	Boeckx, C.Defeating Lexicocentrism:Outline of Elementary Syntactic Structures[M].Part A.Second draft.ICREA/UAB, 2010.
[8]	Borer, H.Structuring Sense[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2005.
[9]	Bloomfield, L.Language[M].New York:Holt, 1933.
[10]	Bolhuis, J., Tattersall, I., Chomsky, N.& R.Berwick.How could language have evolved?[J].PLoS Biol:e1001934.doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001934.2014, 12(8).
[11]	Botha, R.Morphological Mechanisms[M].Oxford:Pergamon Press, 1983.
[12]	Chomsky, N.Syntactic Structures[M].The Hague:Mouton, 1957.
[13]	Chomsky, N.Aspects of the Theory of Syntax[M].Cambridge, MA:MIT Press, 1965.
[14]	Chomsky, N.Remarks on nominalization[C]//Jacobs, R.A.& P.S.Rosenbaum.Readings in English Transformational Grammar.Waltham, MA:Ginn-Blaisdell, 1970.
[15]	Chomsky, N.Lectures on Government and Binding[M].Dordrecht:Foris, 1981.
[16]	Chomsky, N.The Minimalist Program[M].Cambridge, MA:MIT Press, 1995.
[17]	Chomsky, N.On phases[C]//Freidin, R., Otero, C.& M.Zubizarreta.Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory.Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press, 2008.
[18]	Chomsky, N.What Kind of Creatures Are We?[M].New York:Columbia University Press, 2016.
[19]	Embick, D.Voice and the interfaces of syntax[D].Ph.D.dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, 1997.
[20]	Embick, D.On the structure of resultative participles in English[J].Linguistic Inquiry, 2004,(35).
[21]	Embick, D.& R.Noyer.Movement operations after syntax[J].Linguistic Inquiry, 2001, 32(4).
[22]	Enard, W., Przeworski, M., Fisher, S.E., Lai, C.S.L., Wiebe, V., Kitano, T., Monaco, A.P., & S.Pääbo.Molecular evolution of FOXP2, a gene involved in speech and language[J].Nature, 2002, (418).
[23]	Folli, R.& H., Harley The syntax of argument structure:evidence from Italian complex predicates[J].Journal of Linguistics, 2012:1-33.
[24]	Hale, K.& S.J.Keyser.Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure[M].Cambridge, MA:MIT Press, 2002.
[25]	Halle, M.Prolegomena to a theory of word-formation[J].Linguistic Inquiry, 1973, (4).
[26]	Halle, M, & A.Marantz.Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection[C]//Hale, K.& S.J.Keyser.The View from Building 20:Essays in Linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger.Cambridge, Mass:MIT Press, 1993.
[27]	Halle, M, & A.Marantz.Some key features of distributed morphology[C]//Carnie, A., Harley, H.& T.Bures.Papers on Phonology and Morphology.Cambridge, Mass:MIT Press, 1994.
[28]	Harley, H.Subjects, events, and licensing[D].Ph.D.dissertation, MIT, 1995.
[29]	Harley, H.How do verbs get their names? Denominal verbs, manner incorporation and the ontology of verb roots in English[C]//Erteschik-Shir, N.& T.Rapoport.The Syntax of Aspect:Deriving Thematic and Aspectual Interpretation.Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2005.42-64.
[30]	Harley, H.& R.Noyer.State-of-the-article:Distributed morphology[J].Glot International, 1999, (4).
[31]	Harris, Z.Morpheme alternants in linguistic analysis[J].Language, 1942, (18).
[32]	Hockett, C.Problems of morphemic analysis[J].Language, 1947, (23).
[33]	Lapointe, S.Theory of grammatical agreement[D].Ph D.dissertation, MIT, 1980.
[34]	Levin, B.English Verb Classes and Alternations:A Preliminary Investigation[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1993.
[35]	Lieber, R.On the organization of the lexicon[D].Ph D.dissertation, MIT, 1980.
[36]	Lieber, R.Deconstructing Morphology[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1992.
[37]	Lieber, S.& S.Scalise.The lexical integrity hypothesis in a new theoretical universe[C]//Booij, G., Ducceschi, L., Fradin, B., Guevara, E., Ralli, A.& S.Scalise.On-line Proceedings of the Fifth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (MMM5).URL http://mmm.lingue.unibo.it/, 2005.
[38]	Matthews, P.Inflectional Morphology[M].Cambridge:CUP, 1972.
[39]	Marantz, A.No escape from Syntax:don't try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon[C]//Dimitriadis, A., Siegel, L., Surey-Clark, C.& A.Williams.Proceedings of the 21st Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium.University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 1997, 4(2).
[40]	Marantz, A.Words and Things[M].Ms., MIT, 2001.
[41]	Marantz, A.No escape from morphemes in morphological processing[J].Language and Cognitive Processes, 2013a, 28:7, 905-916.
[42]	Marantz, A.Verbal argument structure:Events and participants[J].Lingua, 2013b, (130).
[43]	Nida, E.The Identification of morphemes[J].Language, 1948, (24).
[44]	Ouhalla, J.Introducing Transformational Grammar[M].London:Edward Arnold, 1994.
[45]	Piattelli-Palmarini, M.& J.Uriagereka.A geneticist's dream, a linguist's nightmare:the case of FOXP2[C]//Maria, A.& C.Boeckx.The Biolinguistic Enterprise.Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2011.
[46]	Ramchand, G.Verb Meaning and the Lexicon:A First-phase Syntax[M].Cambridge University Press, 2008.
[47]	Roeper, T.& M.Siegel.A Lexical Transformation for Verbal Compounds[J].Linguistic Inquiry, 1978, 9(2).
[48]	Siegel, D.Topics in English Morphology[M].New York:Garland, 1979.
[49]	Selkirk, E.The Syntax of Words[M].Cambridge, MA:MIT Press, 1982.
[50]	Williams, E.Predication[J].Linguistic Inquiry, 1980, (11).
[51]	卞觉非.略论语素、词、短语的分辨及其区分方法[J].语文研究,1983,8(1).
[52]	程工,李海.分布式形态学的最新进展[J].当代语言学,2016,18(1).
[53]	程工,杨大然.现代汉语动结式复合词的语序及相关问题[J].中国语文,2016,374(5).
[54]	胡旭辉.认知和生成学派视角下的构式理论对比研究[J].外国语,2012,35(3).
[55]	吕叔湘.汉语语法分析问题[M].北京:商务印书馆,1979.
[56]	朱德熙.语法答问[M].北京:商务印书馆,1985.

Cited By

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (550) PDF downloads (6)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

What Should the Lexicon Be Like?-A Biolinguistic Perspective

Abstract

References

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content