• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国人文社会科学核心期刊
  • 中文社会科学引文索引（CSSCI）来源期刊
  • 国家社会科学基金学术期刊资助入选期刊
二维码
SUN Chongfei. Are There Any Logical Problems with the "Noun-verb Inclusion" Hypothesis?[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2022, 45(5): 15-23.
Citation: SUN Chongfei. Are There Any Logical Problems with the "Noun-verb Inclusion" Hypothesis?[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2022, 45(5): 15-23.
shu

Are There Any Logical Problems with the "Noun-verb Inclusion" Hypothesis?

  • School of International Studies, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China

More Information
  • Received Date: March 24, 2022
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract

  • This paper is intended to discuss the issues raised in Jin Lixin's recent article appearing in Journal of Foreign Languages as to whether there are logical problems with the "Noun-verb Inclusion" hypothesis.It is mainly concerned with whether the true nature of Chinese can be accounted for in terms of the "Separation of A and B" pattern and the logical syllogism advocated by the Western logicians, and whether the "Noun-verb Inclusion" hypothesis violates the logical axiom and the inference rules cherished by the logical syllogism.It aims to clarify some misinterpretations and presents the author's position as well.

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (28)
  • [1]
    Croft, W. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
    [2]
    Friederici, A.D. The brain basis of language processing: From structure to function[J]. Physiological Reviews, 2011, (91): 1357-1392.
    [3]
    Friederici, A.D., Gunter, T.C., Hahne, A. & K. Mauth. The relative timing of syntactic and semantic processes in sentence comprehension[J]. Neuroreport, 2004, (15): 165-169.
    [4]
    Hahne, A. & A.D. Friederici. Differential task effects on semantic and syntactic processes as revealed by[J]. Cognitive Brain Research, 2002, (13): 339-356.
    [5]
    Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. Metaphors We Live By[M]. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
    [6]
    Lyons, J. An Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968.
    [7]
    Lyons, J. Semantics (Vol. 2)[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.
    [8]
    Wang, S., Mo, D., Xiang, M., Xu, R. & H. Chen. The time course of semantic and syntactic processing in reading Chinese: Evidence from ERPs[J]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2013, 28(4): 577-596. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2012.660169
    [9]
    Zhang, Y., Yu, J. & J.E. Boland. Semantics does not need a processing license from syntax in reading Chinese[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2010, 36(3): 765-781. doi: 10.1037/a0019254
    [10]
    Zhang, Y., Li, P., Piao, Q., Liu, Y. ., Huang, Y. & H. Shu. Syntax does not necessarily precede semantics in sentence processing: ERP evidence from Chinese[J]. Brain & Language, 2013, (126): 8-19.
    [11]
    胡明扬, 赵淑华, 史有为. 词类问题考察[M]. 北京: 北京语言学院出版社, 1996.
    [12]
    姜望琪. 汉语的"句子"与英语的sentence[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报, 2005, (1): 10-15. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-722X.2005.01.002
    [13]
    金立鑫. "名包动"理论的逻辑问题[J]. 外国语, 2022, (1): 2-13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5139.2022.01.001
    [14]
    吕叔湘. 汉语语法分析问题[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1979.
    [15]
    吕叔湘. 汉语语法论文集[C]. 沈阳: 辽宁教育出版社, 2002.
    [16]
    启功. 汉语现象论丛[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2005.
    [17]
    沈家煊. 我看汉语的词类[J]. 语言科学, 2009, (1): 1-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYKE200901000.htm
    [18]
    沈家煊. 怎样对比才有说服力——以英汉名动对比为例[J]. 现代外语, 2012, (1): 1-13. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDWY201201002.htm
    [19]
    沈家煊. 名词和动词[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2016.
    [20]
    孙崇飞, 王恒兰, 张辉. 汉语句构"以义统形", 印欧语句构"以形制义"——来自ERP的证据[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2019, (3): 396-408. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WJYY201903007.htm
    [21]
    王冬梅. 汉语词类问题[M]. 上海: 学林出版社, 2018.
    [22]
    张东荪. 思想言语与文化(节选)[J]. 当代修辞学, 1938/2013, (5): 38-47. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XCXX201305005.htm
    [23]
    赵元任. 汉语口语语法[M]. 吕叔湘, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1979.
    [24]
    朱德熙. 语法讲义[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1982.
    [25]
    朱德熙. 语法答问[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1985.
    [26]
    朱德熙. 句子和主语: 印欧语影响现代书面汉语和汉语句法分析的一个实例[J]. 世界汉语教学, 1987, (9): 31-34. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJHY198703015.htm
    [27]
    朱晓农. 语言限制逻辑再限制科学: 为什么中国产生不了科学?[J]. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2015, (6): 10-28. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HDSD201506002.htm
    [28]
    朱晓农. 同构推演法: 中国逻辑如何论证[J]. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, (3): 80-97. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HDSD201803013.htm
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]CAI Jun, HAN Jingquan. The Syntactic Word-formation of Mandarin Resultative Verb Compounds from the Perspective of Headedness[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2024, 47(5): 2-10.
    [2]ZHAO Xinyu, YU Xiujin. A Cognitive Study of the Tendency of Daytime Word-Formation from the Perspective of Lexical Typology[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2024, 47(3): 15-26.
    [3]HU Fanzhu, HU Yiming. What Is Linguistics: The Formatting of the Linguistic Knowledge System and Its Reanalysis[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2024, 47(2): 10-18, 73.
    [4]PAN Shiwen. On the Grammaticalization of “(NP1) dui对(duiyu对于) NP2 zhi之N<X>”: The First Use Cases of Formatting and Its Phenomenon of Code-Copying[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2024, 47(1): 48-57.
    [5]JIN Lixin. On the Logical Problem of the "Noun-verb Inclusion" Hypothesis[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2022, 45(1): 2-13.
    [6]CHEN Zhongmin. On the Interactive Mechanism Between Speech Pronunciation and Perception[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2019, 42(6): 2-17.
    [7]XIE Zhiguo. The Progressive Aspect as a Polarity Item (Non-)Licenser: A Crosslinguistic Study[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2019, 42(3): 38-46.
    [8]FENG Yuli. On the Explanatory Power of the Maximality Operation in Semantic Studies and the Problems of Its Application to Chinese Data[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2018, 41(5): 38-47.
    [9]WU Mingjun, PAN Juan. English Pronoun Resolutions by Chinese EFL Learners Within the Framework of the Phase Theory[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2016, 39(3): 64-72.
    [10]LIN Qiaoli, HAN Jingquan. Parts of Speech in Chinese from the Perspective of Distributed Morphology[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2011, 34(2): 47-55.

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 常康杰. 再议“名动包含”理论存在的逻辑问题. 盐城师范学院学报(人文社会科学版). 2025(01): 97-108 .
    2. 庞加光. 认知语法的词类观与汉语类职关系之解. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报). 2024(02): 40-49 .

    Other cited types(1)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (664) PDF downloads (153) Cited by(3)
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References
    Related Articles
    Email Alert RSS

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  Baidu Analytics

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return