Citation: | SHEN Jiaxuan. A Review of Shi Guangan's Endocentric and Exocentric Constructions in Contemporary Chinese[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2023, 46(5): 2-12. |
The author agrees with Shi's criticism (1988) of Zhu's revision (1985a) of Bloomfield's definition of endocentric construction which tries to solve the problem that zhebenshu de chuban 'the publication of the book' in Chinese violates the definition. Zhu's revision is unsuccessful and brings about further contradictions and inconsistencies. The author emphasizes the importance of Shi's critique and opposes settling the problem by leaving it unsettled. Shi (1988) proposes to return to the nominalization solution or the gerund solution, both of which however will also get nowhere in the author's opinion. The author instead suggests the adoption of Shen's theory (2016) of super-noun category and the idea of 'isomorphism in a broad sense'. This review is also a response to Lu's criticism (2022) of the super-noun theory.
[1] |
Bybee, J. The impact of use on representation: Grammar is usage and usage is grammar. Keynote speech at the annual meeting of Linguistic Society of America. Published in 2006 as From Usage to Grammar: The Mind's Response to Repetition[J]. Language, 2006, 82(4): 711-733. doi: 10.1353/lan.2006.0186
|
[2] |
Evans, N. & S.C. Levinson. The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science[J]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2009, 32: 429-492. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X0999094X
|
[3] |
Hengeveld, K. Parts of speech[C]// Fortescue, M., Harder, P. & L. Kristoffersen (eds.). Layered Structure and Reference in a Functional Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1992.29-55.
|
[4] |
Larson, R.K. Chinese as a reverse ezafe language[J]. 语言学论丛, 2009, 39: 30-85.
|
[5] |
白硕. 论"这本书的出版"与X-bar理论的兼容性[EB/OL]. 2014. http:blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog-729574a00102uzf6.html.
|
[6] |
黄正德, 李艳惠, 李亚飞. 汉语句法学[M]. 张和友, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2023.
|
[7] |
陆俭明. 怎么认识汉语在词类上的特点?——评述黎锦、高名凯、朱德熙、沈家煊诸位的词类观[C]//潘文国. 英汉对比与翻译, 第二辑. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社, 2014.29-39.
|
[8] |
陆俭明. 再议沈家煊"汉语名动包含说"[J]. 外国语, 2022, (5): 2-14.
|
[9] |
陆志韦. 从"谓语结构"的主语谈起[J]. 中国语文, 1963, (4): 284-290.
|
[10] |
沈家煊. 名动词的反思: 问题和对策[J]. 世界汉语教学, 2012, (1): 1-17. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJHY201201002.htm
|
[11] |
沈家煊. 形式类的分与合[J]. 现代外语, 2015, (1): 1-14. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDWY201501001.htm
|
[12] |
沈家煊. 名词和动词[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2016.
|
[13] |
施关淦. "这本书的出版"中"出版"的词性——从"向心结构"理论说起[J]. 中国语文通讯, 1981, (4): 8-12.
|
[14] |
施关淦. 现代汉语的向心结构和离心结构[J]. 中国语文, 1988, (4): 265-273.
|
[15] |
吴长安. "这本书的出版"与向心结构理论难题[J]. 当代语言学, 2006, (3): 193-204. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DDYX200603000.htm
|
[16] |
张伯江. 汉语句法的语用属性[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2022.
|
[17] |
赵元任. 中国话的文法(英)[M]. (吕叔湘译《汉语口语语法》)北京: 商务印书馆, 1968.
|
[18] |
周韧. "N的V"结构就是"N的N"结构[J]. 中国语文, 2012, (5): 447-457. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YWZG201205008.htm
|
[19] |
朱德熙. 说"的"[J]. 中国语文, 1961(12): 1-15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YWZG202303006.htm
|
[20] |
朱德熙. "的"字结构和判断句[J]. 中国语文, 1978, (1): 23-27. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJHY199701004.htm
|
[21] |
朱德熙. "的"字结构和判断句[J]. 中国语文, 1978, (2): 104-109. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJHY199701004.htm
|
[22] |
朱德熙. 现代汉语语法研究[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1980.
|
[23] |
朱德熙. 自指和转指——汉语名词化标记"的、者、之"的语法功能和语义功能[J]. 方言, 1983, (1): 16-31. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FYZA198301001.htm
|
[24] |
朱德熙. 关于向心结构的定义[C]//中国语文杂志社. 语法研究和探索. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1985a, 第3辑: 19-23.
|
[25] |
朱德熙. 语法答问[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1985b.
|