• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国人文社会科学核心期刊
  • 中文社会科学引文索引(CSSCI)来源期刊
  • 国家社会科学基金学术期刊资助入选期刊
Jin Lixin, Yu Xiujin. Word Order Type of Mandarin Chinese Revisited on Pairs of Grammatical Elements Correlated and Uncorrelated with OV-VO[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2012, 35(2): 22.
Citation: Jin Lixin, Yu Xiujin. Word Order Type of Mandarin Chinese Revisited on Pairs of Grammatical Elements Correlated and Uncorrelated with OV-VO[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2012, 35(2): 22.

Word Order Type of Mandarin Chinese Revisited on Pairs of Grammatical Elements Correlated and Uncorrelated with OV-VO

More Information
  • This paper revisits the word order type of Mandarin Chinese based on the fifteen pairs of grammatical elements correlated with VO-OV language types and other seven uncorrelated pairs.Among the correlated fifteen pairs, ten are relevant to Mandarin Chinese and the other five absent or atypical, while the seven uncorrelated pairs do not show exotic cases.The research indicates that, in the correlated ten pairs, Mandarin Chinese has four pairs exhibiting both OV and VO word orders, three  pairs tend to be OV order, and the last three VO order.So Mandarin Chinese should probably be regarded as an OV-VO mixed word order type language.
  • Related Articles

    [1]GUO Jianhui, LI Wen. The Deployment and Features of Chinese English Learners’ Logical Grammatical Metaphor: A Corpus-based Study of M. A. Theses[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2025, 48(1): 34-45.
    [2]WANG Pin. Guiding Principles for Grammatical Description Informed by Systemic Functional Typology: A Case Study of MOOD[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2022, 45(5): 53-64.
    [3]ZHU Lishi. A Review on Clause Combining Studies[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2021, 44(2): 109-120.
    [4]YU Xiujin, JIN Lixin. A Typological Approach to Mixed Case-alignment Patterns in Chinese[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2020, 43(5): 30-45.
    [5]LIU Fen, SHI Yuzhi. The Constraints of Grammatical System on Constructions: The Motivations for the Different Comparison Constructions in Chinese and English[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2020, 43(2): 2-8.
    [6]ZHANG Delu. Grammatical Patterns in Engagement in the Appraisal Theory[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2019, 42(2): 2-10.
    [7]LUO Tianhua. Ergativity and Unaccusativity:Problems and Solutions[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2017, 40(4): 25-33.
    [8]LIU Xiaolin, WANG Wenbin. An Exploration of the Studies of the Historical Origins of the English Syntactic Sequence “Subjectively Grammatical+Semantic Elements”[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2017, 40(3): 2-11.
    [9]CONG Yingxu. On the Restraint and Expansion of Ideational Grammatical Metaphor[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2011, 34(5): 46-53.
    [10]LIU Guiling, YANG Zhong. A Typological Study of Grammatical Metonymy and Grammatical Metaphor ——A Review of Metonymy and Metaphor in Grammar[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2011, 34(4): 93-96.

Catalog

    Article views (4424) PDF downloads (0) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return