外国语

外国语 ›› 2022, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (4): 9-17.

• 语言研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

语言研究中的意识形态: 概念梳理、角色界定、理论思考

赵芃1,田海龙2   

  1. 1. 天津商业大学 外国语学院, 天津 300400
    2. 山东师范大学 外国语学院, 山东 济南 250358
  • 收稿日期:2021-07-08 出版日期:2022-07-20 发布日期:2022-08-08
  • 作者简介:赵芃, 博士, 副教授, 硕士生导师。主要研究方向: 社会语言学、批评话语研究|田海龙, 博士, 教授, 博士生导师。主要研究方向: 社会语言学、批评话语研究

Ideology in Linguistic Studies: Scrutinizing the Concept, Investigating Its Role and Reflecting on Theoretical Innovations

Peng ZHAO1,Hailong TIAN2   

  1. 1. School of Foreign Languages, Tianjin University of Commerce, Tianjin 300400
    2. School of Foreign Languages, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358
  • Received:2021-07-08 Online:2022-07-20 Published:2022-08-08

RichHTML

51

PDF (PC)

458

摘要：

意识形态"不仅是政治研究中的概念, 也是语言研究中的概念。意识形态与语言使用的紧密联系使其在近30年的社会语言学、语用学和批评话语分析研究中得到广泛关注和深入研究。对"意识形态"概念在语言研究中的含义进行梳理, 发现其具有四个明显特征, 即"心理意识"特征、"社会立场"特征、"权力关系"特征和"话语体现"特征。对相关研究进行分析, 界定出"意识形态"在语言研究中扮演的三个角色: 1)在批评话语分析领域意识形态是语言研究揭示的内容, 2)在语用学领域它是论证的课题, 3)在社会语言学领域它是语言研究借助的工具。这些讨论突显语言研究将语言运用作为社会实践进行研究的趋势, 有助于探究言说者的能动性, 通过探究意识形态在语言研究中的角色和作用促进语言学理论创新。

关键词: 意识形态, 能动性, 社会语言学, 批评话语分析, 语用学

Abstract:

Ideology, normally a concept in political studies, is also a key concern in sociolinguistics, pragmatics and critical discourse analysis in the last thirty years.Reviewing relevant studies of ideology in these linguistic fields, this article identifies four features of the concept of ideology in linguistic studies, namely, ideology being characteristic in terms of consciousness, social position, power relation, and discourse realization.The article continues its investigation by highlighting three roles ideology plays in linguistic studies, namely, ideology being the content linguistic study is to reveal, the issues linguistic study investigates, and the tool by which linguistic research is to be done.Finally, the article relates what is discussed here with relevant issues at home, proposing that further concern of ideology in linguistic studies is needed for a better understanding of speaker's agency in the process of decoding the social meaning of language use as well as for theoretical innovations.

Key words: ideology, agency, sociolinguistics, critical discourse analysis, pragmatics

中图分类号: 

  • H03
1 Ahearn, L. Agency[C]//Duranti, A. Key Terms in Language and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell, 2001.
2 Althusser, L. Ideology and ideological state apparatuses[C]//Althusser, L. Lenin and Philosophy, and Other Essays. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1971.
3 Bell, A. Succeeding waves: Seeking sociolinguistic theory for the twenty-first century[C]// Coupland, N. Sociolinguistics: Theoretical Debates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
4 Blommaert, J. Language Ideological Debates[C]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1999.
5 Coupland, N. Introduction: Sociolinguistic theory and the practice of sociolinguistics[C]//Coupland, N. Sociolinguistics: Theoretical Debates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
6 Eckert, P. Three waves of variation studies: The emergence of meaning in the study of variation[J]. Annual Review of Anthropology, 2012, 41, 87- 100.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145828
7 Fairclough, N. Language and Globalization[M]. London: Routledge, 2006.
8 Fairclough, N. & R. Wodak. Critical discourse analysis[C]//Tian, H. & P. Zhao. Critical Discourse Analysis: Essential Readings. Tianjin: Nankai University Press, 2012.
9 Fowler, R. & G. Kress. Critical linguistics[C]//Fowler, R., Kress, G., Hodge, B. & T. Trew. Language and Control. London, Boston and Henley: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1979.
10 Gal, S. Multiplicity and contention among language ideologies[C]//Schieffelin, B., Woolard, K & P. Kroskrity. Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
11 Gal, S. Sociolinguistic differentiation[C]//Coupland, N. Sociolinguistics: Theoretical Debates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
12 Gal, S. , and J. Irvine . The boundaries of languages and disciplines: How ideologies construct difference[J]. Social Research, 1995, 62 (4): 967- 1001.
13 Gal, S. , and J. Irvine . Signs of Difference: Language and Ideology in Social Life[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
14 Halliday, M. Language as a Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning[M]. London: Arnold, 1978.
15 Irvine, J. Style as distinctiveness: The culture and ideology of linguistic differentiation[C]// Penelope, E. & J. Rickford. Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
16 Irvine, J. & S. Gal. Language ideology and linguistic differentiation[C]//Kroskrity, P. Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities, and Identities. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press, 2000.
17 Kress, G. , and R. Hodge . Language as Ideology[M]. London and New York: Routledge, 1979.
18 Kroskrity, P. Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities, and Identities[C]. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press, 2000.
19 Marx, K. & F. Engels. The German Ideology[M]. London: Lawrence and Wishart, [1845] 1970.
20 Reisigl, M. , and R. Wodak . Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetoric of Racism and Antisemitism[M]. London: Routledge, 2001.
21 Schieffelin, B., Woolard, K. & P. Kroskrity. Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory[C]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
22 Silverstein, M. Language structure and linguistic ideology[C]//Clyne, P., Flanks, W. & C. Hofbauer. The Elements: A Parasession on Linguistic Units and Levels. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 1979.
23 Silverstein, M. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life[J]. Language and Communication, 2003, 23, 193- 229.
doi: 10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00013-2
24 Tian, H. Joint review of Van Dijk's Discourse and Context and Society and Discourse[J]. Language in Society, 2011, 40 (1): 116- 121.
doi: 10.1017/S0047404510000941
25 Van Dijk, T.A. Racism and the Press[M]. London: Routledge, 1991.
26 Van Dijk, T.A. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach[M]. London: Sage Publications, 1998.
27 Van Dijk, T.A. Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
28 Van Dijk, T.A. Society and Discourse: How Social Contexts Influence Text and Talk[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
29 Verschueren, J. Ideology in Language Use: Pragmatic Guidelines for Empirical Research[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
30 Wee, L. Are there zombies in language policy? Theoretical interventions and the continued vitality of (apparently) defunct concepts[C]//Coupland, C. Sociolinguistics: Theoretical Debates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
31 Wodak, R. What CDA is about — A summary of its history, important concepts and its developments[C]// Wodak, R. & M. Meyer. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage Pulbications, 2001.
32 Woolard, K. Introduction: Language ideology as a field of inquiry[C]//Schieffelin, B., Woolard, K. & P. Kroskrity. Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
33 Woolard, K. Language ideology[C]//Stanlaw, J. The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology. London: John Wiley & Sons, 2021.
34 陈新仁. 商业广告"身份套路"的批评语用分析[J]. 山东外语教学, 2018, 39 (5): 24- 33.
35 谷小娟, 张迈曾. 语体变异的社会语言学研究[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2007, (6): 7- 9.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6038.2007.06.002
36 田海龙. 变异社会语言学的风格研究——兼谈与修辞学风格研究的互鉴[J]. 当代修辞学, 2022, (4): 11- 21.
37 田海龙, 赵芃. 社会语言学新发展研究[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2021.
38 文旭. 基于"社会认知"的社会认知语言学[J]. 现代外语, 2019, 42 (3): 293- 305.
39 辛斌. 体裁互文性的话语分析——以南中国海仲裁案为例[J]. 外国语, 2018, 41 (5): 96- 103.
40 张辉, 张艳敏. 批评认知语言学: 理论源流、认知基础与研究方法[J]. 现代外语, 2020, 43 (5): 628- 640.
41 赵芃. 从"再情景化"到"指向秩序"——批评话语研究概念性工具的新发展[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2021, (3): 23- 30.
42 赵芃, 田海龙. 变异社会语言学研究的新发展[J]. 现代外语, 2022, 45 (1): 137- 147.
[1] 冉永平,杨璘璘,刘平. 语用学的包容性及融合性[J]. 外国语, 2022, 45(4): 2-8.
[2] 王美琪, 何春燕. 人际语用学视角下冲突会话中的关系元话语研究[J]. 外国语, 2022, 45(3): 59-70.
[3] 刘风光, 石文瑞. 伦理语用学视阈下中美政治谴责言语行为对比研究[J]. 外国语, 2022, 45(3): 71-81.
[4] 周凌, 张绍杰. 反问句否定含义强度及(不)礼貌等级的实验语用学研究[J]. 外国语, 2022, 45(1): 25-35.
[5] 刘鼎甲. 新冠肺炎疫情中美国媒体涉华报道的语料库历时分析[J]. 外国语, 2021, 44(6): 52-64.
[6] 冉永平, 黄旭. 人际语用学视角下的礼貌与关系[J]. 外国语, 2020, 43(3): 35-45.
[7] 王斌华, 高非. 口译的意识形态研究——口译研究的拓展[J]. 外国语, 2020, 43(3): 89-101.
[8] 李晶晶. 多模态批评话语分析视角下的口译过程研究[J]. 外国语, 2019, 42(6): 60-70.
[9] 尚晓明, 程璐璐. 发展语用学视域中的语用障碍问题研究[J]. 外国语, 2019, 42(4): 103-112.
[10] 冉永平. 人际语用学视角下人际关系管理的人情原则[J]. 外国语, 2018, 41(4): 44-53,65.
[11] 任伟. 汉语请求言语行为的变异语用学研究[J]. 外国语, 2018, 41(4): 66-75.
[12] 杨敏, 符小丽. 基于语料库的“历史语篇分析”(DHA)的过程与价值——以美国主流媒体对希拉里邮件门的话语建构为例[J]. 外国语, 2018, 41(2): 77-85.
[13] 宋健楠. 批评话语分析中态度意向的邻近化语义构建[J]. 外国语, 2017, 40(6): 12-19.
[14] 胡开宝, 孟令子. 批评译学研究：翻译研究新进展[J]. 外国语, 2017, 40(6): 57-68.
[15] 李成团, 冉永平. 人际语用学视域下争辩会话中的身份构建研究[J]. 外国语, 2017, 40(6): 2-11.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
[1] 张德禄. 评价理论介入系统中的语法模式研究[J]. 外国语, 2019, 42(2): 2 -10 .
[2] 蒋承勇. 走向融合与融通——跨文化比较与外国文学研究方法更新[J]. 外国语, 2019, 42(1): 103 -110 .
[3] 许钧. 翻译是先锋,语言是利器——五四运动前后的翻译与语言问题[J]. 外国语, 2019, 42(4): 2 -3,6 .
[4] 李思旭. 处所转换构式的语言类型学研究[J]. 外国语, 2019, 42(1): 2 -24 .
[5] 叶婧婷. 反身领属与强化的类型学考察[J]. 外国语, 2019, 42(1): 25 -38 .
[6] 谢天振. 百年五四与今天的重写翻译史——对重写翻译史的几点思考[J]. 外国语, 2019, 42(4): 4 -6 .
[7] 张莹. 行动者网络理论与中国文化外译——以熊式一英译的Lady Precious Stream(《王宝川》)为例[J]. 外国语, 2019, 42(4): 25 -34 .
[8] 柳俊. 东南亚语言区域的双及物结构类型及其成因[J]. 外国语, 2019, 42(4): 35 -45 .
[9] 雍茜. 违实句中的时制、体貌和语气——兼论语言标记系统的形成、类推和强化[J]. 外国语, 2019, 42(2): 11 -23 .
[10] 王雅刚. “被X”雪克隆的言知分化与构式压制[J]. 外国语, 2019, 42(2): 34 -44 .